[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

The numerics tested work properly. on Julia Version 0.4.0-pre+7107 Commit 4e44a1c (2015-08-31 16:51 UTC) Platform Info: System: Darwin (x86_64-apple-darwin14.5.0) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-5557U CPU @ 3.10GHz WORD_SIZE: 64 BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Haswell)

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

(when version 0.4 is released, you will have fma support) On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 7:03:06 AM UTC-4, Arch Call wrote: > > You have made some changes to the script and I now get! > > The numerics tested work properly. >The version you are using does not support fma

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

Thank you. The information is correct for your system. On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 7:03:06 AM UTC-4, Arch Call wrote: > > You have made some changes to the script and I now get! > > The numerics tested work properly. >The version you are using does not support fma.

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

You have made some changes to the script and I now get! The numerics tested work properly. The version you are using does not support fma. I am running 3.11 on Windows 10 with 64 bit...Arch On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 1:04:34 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: > >

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

I'm hoping for feedback from a variety of environments, hardware and OS. Your information about Win10 is appreciated. On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 6:19:07 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: > > thanks for running it > > On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 5:33:10 AM UTC-4, Nils Gudat wrote:

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

thanks for running it On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 5:33:10 AM UTC-4, Nils Gudat wrote: > > Not sure that this is what you meant by "(shh, it's new hardware)", but on > a Surface Pro 3 running Windows 10 the test passes. >

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

Not sure that this is what you meant by "(shh, it's new hardware)", but on a Surface Pro 3 running Windows 10 the test passes.

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

I would appreciate hearing from a few supercomputer users and a few (shh, it's new hardware) users. On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:24:35 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: > > Thank you for running it. My guess is that, for your environment, this is > false: VERSION >= v"0.4.0-dev+2823" >

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

Thank you for running it. My guess is that, for your environment, this is false: VERSION >= v"0.4.0-dev+2823" I am putting that test in now. If that is true -- pls let me know. On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 2:17:02 AM UTC-4, Arch Call wrote: > > I am getting fma not defined! It is probabl

[julia-users] Re: a floating point test for other's environments

I am getting fma not defined! It is probably related to line 22. On Wednesday, September 9, 2015 at 1:04:34 AM UTC-4, Jeffrey Sarnoff wrote: > > I wrote this FloatTest >