thanks much. I have had to go down to 31 workers in some instances after
all.
On Saturday, August 30, 2014 5:08:18 AM UTC-7, Florian Oswald wrote:
>
> sorry correct my call to
>
> julia -p 32 exper.jl > myout.out
>
> (without the first < , not sure that makes a difference)
>
> On Saturday, 30 Aug
sorry correct my call to
julia -p 32 exper.jl > myout.out
(without the first < , not sure that makes a difference)
On Saturday, 30 August 2014 12:58:57 UTC+1, Florian Oswald wrote:
>
> @require should work for what you want. i usually run batch jobs like this
>
> julia -p 32 < exper.jl > myout.o
@require should work for what you want. i usually run batch jobs like this
julia -p 32 < exper.jl > myout.out
maybe give it a try?
also, do you have 32 CPUs? not sure how stable this is if you use plenty
more processes than cores.
here is a working example for a large cluster:
https://github.co
julia> versioninfo()
Julia Version 0.3.1-pre+405
Commit 444fafe* (2014-08-27 20:11 UTC)
Platform Info:
System: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2670 0 @ 2.60GHz
WORD_SIZE: 64
BLAS: libopenblas (USE64BITINT DYNAMIC_ARCH NO_AFFINITY Sandybridge)
LAPACK: libopenblas
LI
Thanks, it works quite well. All are on the same machine and read the same
filesystem:
Version 0.3.1-pre+405 (2014-08-27 20:11 UTC)
Commit 444fafe* (2 days old master)
x86_64-linux-gnu
julia> @everywhere begin
include("ee.jl")
end
julia> wsum = @parallel (+) for i
The above example should only work if all nodes have access to the same
filesystem. Is this the case?
On Friday, August 29, 2014 9:23:31 PM UTC-4, Jake Bolewski wrote:
>
> Does the following work?
>
> julia> @everywhere begin
>include("ee.jl")
>end
>
> julia> wsum = @parallel (+)
Does the following work?
julia> @everywhere begin
include("ee.jl")
end
julia> wsum = @parallel (+) for ii in 1:16384
sq(ii)
end
It also helps to give us your versioninfo().
On Friday, August 29, 2014 9:11:52 PM UTC-4, Travis Porco wrote:
>
> Hi, interactive works
Hi, interactive works fine with 32, script fails for smaller numbers.
Julia Version 0.3.1-pre+405 (2014-08-27 20:11 UTC) Commit 444fafe* (2 days
old master), Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-54-virtual x86_64).
Thanks.
On Friday, August 29, 2014 10:15:54 AM UTC-7, Travis Porco wrote:
>
> H
Your example works fine for me:
julia-av/base [jcb/arrayview●] » julia -p 10 exp.jl
wsum => 1466149724160
Does it still fail with a smaller processor count.
Does the interactive version work?
julia-av/base [jcb/arrayview●] » julia
_
_ _ _(_)_ | A fresh approach to te
More detail:
Given file exper.jl being
require("ee.jl")
wsum = @parallel (+) for ii in 1:16384
sq(ii)
end
and ee.jl being
function sq(n)
n*n
end
terminal session gives
julia> include("exper.jl")
1466149724160
but:
nohup ../julia/julia -p 32 < exper.jl &
yields a cascade of these:
except
10 matches
Mail list logo
