[julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread Ivar Nesje
Please don't double post your questions https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/8445. How did you update Julia? http://julialang.org/downloads/ has not yet been updated https://github.com/JuliaLang/julialang.github.com/pull/146 with links to 0.3.1, and your version of Julia identifies itself

Re: [julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread K Leo
Sorry for double posting. There is nothing special with the print statement. It has been simply: println(file, A, ,, B, ,, C) And with that I usually got: 162038.8,160.2,0.26118204 The update came in today from the julia release PPA for Ubuntu:

Re: [julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread K Leo
Removed the binary update and compiled julia from the 0.3.0+6 source. Things become usual. On 2014年09月23日 18:55, K Leo wrote: Sorry for double posting. There is nothing special with the print statement. It has been simply: println(file, A, ,, B, ,, C) And with that I usually got:

Re: [julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread Iain Dunning
There was an issue and the unstable nightly version got pushed to juliareleases - should be fixed soon. On Tuesday, September 23, 2014 8:36:13 AM UTC-4, K leo wrote: Removed the binary update and compiled julia from the 0.3.0+6 source. Things become usual. On 2014年09月23日 18:55, K Leo

Re: [julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-23 Thread Elliot Saba
Yes sorry about that. This has now been fixed. Thanks for reporting! -E On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Iain Dunning iaindunn...@gmail.com wrote: There was an issue and the unstable nightly version got pushed to juliareleases - should be fixed soon. On Tuesday, September 23, 2014

[julia-users] Re: issues with println to file

2014-09-22 Thread K Leo
A number like these messes up DataFrames, which considers it as a string which then can not be easily converted to a float. Any advice on what to do? On 2014年09月23日 09:31, K Leo wrote: Just updated to reportedly 0.3.1 but displayed as 0.4.0-dev+543. println to file now get something like