Re: [JPP-Devel] Suggested Procedures For Collaborative Development Of OpenJUMP

2007-02-28 Thread Stefan Steiniger
to put it short: Great email Manuel, .. which makes a lot of things clearer to me. and with respect to the improvements listed as [1],[2],... - [15], I completely agree that these (core) changes can and should not be done as plugins, since they are of general necessity. BTW: i am quite glad to h

Re: [JPP-Devel] [Geotools-devel] Google Summer of Code

2007-02-28 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hei Sun, why do you speak in points [1] to [3] about Kosmo and not SkyJUMP? stefan Sunburned Surveyor schrieb: > Larry, > > I'm not quite sure about your plans for work on SkyJUMP, and I know your > flexibility with the project is limited by some government restrictions. > However, I have se

Re: [JPP-Devel] Suggested Procedures For Collaborative Development Of OpenJUMP

2007-02-28 Thread listas
Hello all: In first place I would like to say hello everybody. This is the first time I write directly to the list and we (at Kosmo team) are very happy with it. Lot of very interesting ideas and proposal are being write here during the last days. I would like to explain some of my point of

Re: [JPP-Devel] [Geotools-devel] Google Summer of Code

2007-02-28 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Larry, I'm not quite sure about your plans for work on SkyJUMP, and I know your flexibility with the project is limited by some government restrictions. However, I have set up a section of the JPP wiki for collaborative development, and there is a page there for SkyJUMP. If you think you will be

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP at FOSSGIS in Berlin

2007-02-28 Thread Ugo Taddei
Hi Larry, I got a mesg from someone from their team and will include them in the list. Larry Becker wrote: > Hi Ugo, > > You didn't mention Kosmo. I have just started looking at Kosmo's > code and it is incredible. There are 1437 Java files in Kosmo > compared to 948 in OpenJump, 897 in SkyJ