Hi guys,
In my laboratory we are working on the memory limitation. It will be
resolved in one month.
Currently we define a new pipeline for datasources access (write and read).
In few days a web page will be available with the documentation and the
design architecture.
See u
R1.
--
the same, as michael says, holds for me.
I dont have any feelings against subversion, but why switching to
another systems if everything works fine.
And you may remember that i send a link around where somebody did
compare svn and cvs, and according to this person there is no clear
advantage
Hi Sunburned
We read this post and list in general with attention. There are very
important matter in them. Memory usage as you say, for example, was a
main problem (and limitation) until we resolve it for us to work in
production environment. Last weeks have been very intense ones. We
Stefan,
How is you thesis going? I hope well.
You wrote: And you may remember that i send a link around where somebody
did
compare svn and cvs, and according to this person there is no clear
advantage for either system.
I think there is some small advantages to SVN, at least on the
Thanks for your input Manuel.
I don't think there seems to be any major problems with switching OpenJUMP
development to JDK 1.5. I will propose this to the mailing list.
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 4/14/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sunburned
We read this post and list in
I still need to hear back from Vivid Solutions, but if I get a positive
response to them I'd like to propose moving development of OpenJUMP to the
1.5 JDK. This would mean we'd compile OpenJUMP with that JDK and do our
testing on the corresponding JRE.
We'd also have to check with Jon about
Hei Landon,
sorry .. but you should have recognized that we are already working with
1.5!!!
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
I still need to hear back from Vivid Solutions, but if I get a positive
response to them I'd like to propose moving development of OpenJUMP to
the 1.5 JDK. This
Hei Landon, with respect to your questions to Erwan
please have also a look on the google-doc document.
As far as i know you were one of the persons having acceess to it ... In
that doc is a very brief sketch of the system.
otherwise i send you a copy of the doc
stefan
Sunburned Surveyor
Yes, I think the thread kind of got lost. I was talking about changing the
code to take advantage of Java 5''s features, not just compiling with it,
which as Stefan pointed out, we have been doing for quite some time.
Larry
On 4/14/07, Stefan Steiniger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hei Landon,
Boy do I feel sheepish! :]
Is there a reason why we avoided using the new language features of
Java 1.5if we are compiling with the
1.5 JDK?
Is there reasons to avoid using those features now?
Or are we already doing that to? :]
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 4/14/07, Larry Becker [EMAIL
mhm.. i do not really know
which features are exactly meant. But the reason why we are compiling
with 1.5 is that I transfered some code from piroljump to OJ and they
used the new cast feature of arraylists.
so.. in some particular way we use it, but we did not change any old code
stefan
Hey Jon/Developers,
Apart from the development thread of OJ, perhaps it should be reminded that
most people by now use 1.5, if not 1.6 ;-)
Kind regards
Pedro.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Jonathan Aquino
Sent: sábado, 14 de Abril de
Thanks Pedro - I checked the nightly build machine and it is running Java
1.5, so no changes needed there in fact.
Jon
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Pedro Doria Meunier
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2007 3:30 PM
To: 'List for
13 matches
Mail list logo
