Re: [JPP-Devel] Solution for working with two feature models???

2007-04-20 Thread Markus Müller
David and all, thanks for mentioning deegree. We at lat/lon (- especially Ugo) are contributing to OpenJUMP for quite some time and I hope we will in the future develop more and more plug-ins (also see Email from Jan describing the WFS plugin). We also have plans for extending the Feature

[JPP-Devel] R: Solution for working with two feature models???

2007-04-20 Thread P . Rizzi Ag . Mobilità Ambiente
I would vote for having converters in and out of the GT Feature model as required. It's only really needed for I/O, right? For other functionality, use the raw functionality provided by GT (such as coordinate transformations) and develop a JUMP-specific API on top of it. One of

[JPP-Devel] GeoTools = Pandora's Box???

2007-04-20 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
I feel like I have opened Pandora's Box with my blog post on the challenges of adopting the GeoTools Feature Model in OpenJUMP. This has made me realize how powerful, and dangerous, a single blog post can be. Still, I believe an important issue has been raised. I am now trying to grapple with

Re: [JPP-Devel] [Geotools-devel] Requesting some thoughts on GeoTools...

2007-04-20 Thread Sunburned Surveyor
Justin, Your comments will be very helpful to me. I think it would be prudent to stick with the stable version of GeoTools for my work on a converter between OpenJUMP and GeoTools feature. The Sunburned Surveyor On 4/20/07, Justin Deoliveira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Edgar, PS: aren't