Ok.. I changed the line in the about dialog to OpenJUMP 1.3
and the "NEU" thing, I just forgot to translate that string ;)
Michaël Michaud schrieb:
>> - On the about dialog: We did, up to now refer there to the original
>> JUMP version number. However, it may be worth to revise this policy and
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Michaël Michaud [mailto:michael.mich...@free.fr]
Lähetetty: ti 14.4.2009 21:34
Vastaanottaja: OpenJump develop and use
Aihe: Re: [JPP-Devel] found a kangaroo in the easter egg
> If I don't get any negative feedback towards end of next week I will
> co
If I don't get any negative feedback towards end of next week I will
continue and make a windows setup file and we can update the java doc.
Hi, I started to do fast but extensive tests with version 1.3.
I know it is late and hope I will not find anything serious.
I already tested the file me
> - On the about dialog: We did, up to now refer there to the original
> JUMP version number. However, it may be worth to revise this policy and
> change to the OJ number?
> any thought by others?
>
I think the Help>About should show the last version (1.3 !)
Michaël
> stefan
>
> Uwe Dalluege
Thank you Stefan for all the hard work you did,
and thanks to Andreas for the help
Michaël
Stefan Steiniger a écrit :
> Oh great.. I didn't saw that it created a complete new copy in a
> subfolder of tags/1.2/
>
> so easy ;)
> thank you
>
> stefan
>
> Andreas Schmitz schrieb:
>
>> Stefan Stei
Thanks Uwe,
I will look into it.
- Funnily I believed that I did solve the Datei>New issue.
- On the about dialog: We did, up to now refer there to the original
JUMP version number. However, it may be worth to revise this policy and
change to the OJ number?
any thought by others?
stefan
Uwe Da
Oh great.. I didn't saw that it created a complete new copy in a
subfolder of tags/1.2/
so easy ;)
thank you
stefan
Andreas Schmitz schrieb:
> Stefan Steiniger wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> I am preparing the OJ 1.3 release (message will follow) and was now on
>> the the way to tag the current trunk v
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
Hi,
> I am preparing the OJ 1.3 release (message will follow) and was now on
> the the way to tag the current trunk version. Unfortunately while
> tagging I forgot to change in tag line "1.2" to "1.3", so everything
> related to the new 1.3 tag has been probably copied
