I see your point, although newly-created BasicFeatures aren't really an
issue - they are always dirty by definition. It's just features which
have had their attributes modified which are the problem.
I'm not totally crazy about this MutableBasicFeature/BasicFeature
dichotomy, but it might be w
Larry, can you summarize the proposed change, for the benefit of those
who haven't read all 45 posts?
(Maybe JUMP needs some sort of RFC mechansim...)
I don't understand your comment that "If it was per-feature
overhead...". I thought this *was* implemented per-feature? If not, I
really don'
Hei,
you can check out the source code if you want:
pls. look into these classes:
com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.cursortool.MeasureTool
and here:
com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.ui.cursortool.CoordinateListMetrics
if you find something - pls. tell us
stefan
karthik shravanam wrote:
> H
OK. We will let Christopher decide. I might make more sense to keep
the code at deegree.
SS
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Andreas Schmitz wrote:
> Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
>
> Hi Landon,
>
>> I was thinking Christopher might work on JTin from the JPP SVN. When
>> he has some working (and tes
Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
Hi Landon,
> I was thinking Christopher might work on JTin from the JPP SVN. When
> he has some working (and tested) code we can approach deegree to see
> what further work will need to be done to integrate the code as part
> of the deegree library?
>
> Will this work?
I was thinking Christopher might work on JTin from the JPP SVN. When
he has some working (and tested) code we can approach deegree to see
what further work will need to be done to integrate the code as part
of the deegree library?
Will this work?
The Sunburned Surveyor
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12
I will do some testing when I get time. If Chris beats me to it as
part of his SoC work, he can run some testing with methods he thinks
might work best.
SS
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Larry Becker wrote:
> What can I say that I haven't already said? If you have the code I sent
> you, I wou
What can I say that I haven't already said? If you have the code I sent
you, I would suggest making modifications to it and see if it works.
Larry
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Sunburned Surveyor <
sunburned.surve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we are concerned about memory we might try a single
Stefan Steiniger wrote:
Hi,
> it is wise - I aggree. But I would not promise anything, since
> a) JTin does something new and deegree requires I believe certain
> stability and testing, and
if the respective code stands by itself, and is implemented in the development
branch, I don't see any pr
Christopher wrote:
Hi,
> I'll do whatever I need to. Do you have an address for degree's code
> repository so I can check out a tree.
you can check out the deegree development branch from here:
https://wald.intevation.org/svn/deegree/base/trunk
Best regards, Andreas
--
l a t / l o n GmbH
Aen
10 matches
Mail list logo
