Hi Michaël,
thank you! I will test it next week.
Regards
Uwe
Am 31.07.2011 12:51, schrieb Michaël Michaud:
> Hi Uwe,
>
> OK, I spent some time in ColorThemingStylePanel code, and tried to
> improve/clean it.
> I made several modifications :
> - now, the attribute selection decides which classi
Yes, they are definitely positioning FGDBs as the replacement for
shapefiles - at least in their world. FGDB has a lot of advantages for
them - no limit on file size, able to contain all of the weird and
wonderful ESRI data structures, and platform-independent. Oh, and no
11-char limit on fie
Hi Larry,
thanks for the link.
and on your question: mhm... not sure.
I would rather wait and see what other GIS will do.
Write support for some other open source databases is more important? ..
and integration of your KML support might be as well.
cheers from sunny Calgary
stefan
On 03/08/2
It would seem that ESRI is positioning the "file geodatabase" as the heir to
the shapefile. They now have a cross-platform API that provides access
without ArcObjects.
http://forums.arcgis.com/threads/31841-Welcome-to-the-discussion-forum-for-the-File-Geodatabase-API
!
Is this something the JUMP
