Bugs item #3469215, was opened at 2012-01-03 12:58
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by michaudm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=679906&aid=3469215&group_id=118054
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the
On 03.01.2012 12:50, Benjamin Gudehus wrote:
> @Ede
>
>> the intended way to develop extensions with plugins is afaik like this:
>
> Ok, I stumpled upon the workbench-properties.xml when I made the list of all
> plugins, but never used the xml file for my plugins, since I never use
> FeatureIns
@Michaël
> Interesting. What kind of test ?
Three kinds of tests: (1) for the dialog using a GUI robot with FEST-Swing,
(2) for the plugin functionality and (3) for unittests of components used
by plugins. I write these tests BDD-style using Spock and Groovy and run
them with JUnit within Eclipse
On 03.01.2012 10:44, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
> Its not truly dynamical and does not work for GUI changes, but for
> algorithms (and when class variables inside the plugIn class don't
> change) I can modify code live in Eclipse Debug Mode.
>
if i always recreate gui components (for testing) i ca
Hi Benjamin,
yup - what Ede describes is what I do too in Eclipse.
I have a OpenJUMP project that I setup and run without any addons (but
using the default-plugins option)
Then I have setup another Project that will contain my own code. As you
describe the PlugIn or is Extension class is where I
Hei Jody,
(I cc: OJ Devel)
OpenJUMP should already run with OpenJDK. Though, some more testing with
some latest plugins is needed.
I haven't tried the OpenJDK Mac version as Java can be received directly
from Apple. But thanks for the pointer.
to you a happy hacking for 2012 as well,
stefan
