Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Le 07/03/2013 10:05, Rahkonen Jukka a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > I did not know about the general R_G_B field support. I can see that if
> hand coloured layer is saved into OpenJUMP project it is considered to be
> classified by unique values of R_G_B field. This has some
Bugs item #3600947, was opened at 2013-01-15 02:57
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by michaudm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=679906&aid=3600947&group_id=118054
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> b)
> Start to diraw a linestring than click again to linestring tool
> - the phantom doesn't disappears and user can go on drawing the original
> linestring
With older version, like r3131, also re-selecting linestring tool cancels
drawing.
-Jukka-
--
Bugs item #3602633, was opened at 2013-01-30 00:01
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by michaudm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=679906&aid=3602633&group_id=118054
Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment
On 08.03.2013 09:13, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
>
>
> Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
>
>> b)
>> Start to diraw a linestring than click again to linestring tool
>> - the phantom doesn't disappears and user can go on drawing the original
>> linestring
>
> With older version, like r3131, also re-selecting line
edgar soldin wrote:
> On 08.03.2013 09:13, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> >
> >
> > Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> >
> >> b)
> >> Start to diraw a linestring than click again to linestring tool
> >> - the phantom doesn't disappears and user can go on drawing the
> >> original linestring
> >
> > With older versi
On 08.03.2013 08:55, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenJUMP info screen shows the jre version but not if it is 32 or 64 bit. I
> cannot check but perhaps it does not report either if there is Oracle jre,
> Oracle jdk or OpenJDK variant in use.
>
> What is the meaning of total memory in the jr
On 07.03.2013 23:56, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Almost. I seems that selecting the same tool again does not do cancel and by
> doing that it is still possible to make ghost lines and also to make othet
> shortcuts (pan, zoom) to behave in an odd way. If you can also make
> re-selecting th
edgar.soldin wrote:
>
> On 07.03.2013 23:56, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Almost. I seems that selecting the same tool again does not do cancel and
> by doing that it is still possible to make ghost lines and also to make othet
> shortcuts (pan, zoom) to behave in an odd way. If you can
hello everybody,
am trying to personilize the method flash in the zoom method. what i did is
to bring the code of this method, so once the user click on a row of the
the table the feature must be zoomed then flashed and stayed flashed, in
other words the outline of the feature changes the color (r
the log says that it cannot cast a collection of geometry to polygon.
How can i do the cast without error.
--
*Asma OUQALLI*
Élève ingénieur : 3ème Sciences d'Information Géographique (SIG).
Chef de commission développement professionnel - Rotaract EHTP.
Chef de cellule Media - Olympiades EHTP
I confirm with ubuntu
2013/3/8 Rahkonen Jukka
> edgar.soldin wrote:
> >
> > On 07.03.2013 23:56, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Almost. I seems that selecting the same tool again does not do cancel
> and
> > by doing that it is still possible to make ghost lines and also to make
>
Hey guys,
I've been following the discussion on linestring digitizing, and it
reminded me that SkyJUMP's Constrained Linestring tool seems to support an
edit mode that OJ doesn't. If the linestring is selected, you are allowed
to extend it from either end by simply clicking an endpoint within sna
Hi,
OpenJUMP supports it just like you described with the standard Linestring tool.
Switch snapping on, select an existing line and you can extent it from endpoint
or startpoint. You can also connect two distinct linestrings by selecting them
both and digitizing a new connecting line. It works
As with many things it helps to know the secret. It works for me after I
turned on snapping. Thanks Jukka. You are The Man when it comes to
digitizing.
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Rahkonen Jukka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ** **
>
> OpenJUMP supports it just like you described with the standard
Hi,
One way would be to return a MultiPolygon instead of a Collection
in selectedBornes method
I assume bornes are Polygon (and did not check the code, just to give
you the idea)
ArrayList selectedBornes = new ArrayList();
for(BasicFeature basicFeature : BornesList) {
selectedB
On 07.03.2013 10:17, Asma ouqalli wrote:
> Hello,
> i have a problem with my openjump concerning memory, it's too slow to execute
> plugins and do operations on my data that contains 34000 records per layer,
> in run configuration i used Xmx150M do i have to add more memory in Xmx (my
> compute
> before somebody suggests it. we can't simply raise the current 512M as it
> would simply fail to start if the box can't acquire that much, in the rare
> case it is run on a very ram scarce system.
Hi Ede,
agreed, but I would not wonder if we have some users with less than
512MB. I myself use
On 08.03.2013 22:56, Stefan Steiniger wrote:
>
>> before somebody suggests it. we can't simply raise the current 512M as it
>> would simply fail to start if the box can't acquire that much, in the rare
>> case it is run on a very ram scarce system.
> Hi Ede,
>
> agreed, but I would not wonder i
On 08.03.2013 23:03, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
>> However, if we look into the download list = countries... (India,
>> > Indonesia, Bulgaria, Colombia, Bolivia, Ethiopia, etc.) I can see that
>> > people do not have the latest equipment. So 512 should be best.
>> > http://sourceforge.net/project
20 matches
Mail list logo