Re: [JPP-Devel] Fwd: Re: setting coordinate system for OSM data

2013-08-24 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi, > alas the other thread, here some thought from Michael, when I asked > something offlist about existing CRS stuff. Sorry, I should have copied this answer to the list. By the way, I agree with Matthias and Stefan, the transformation must not be automatic although there are a few options liste

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-24 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
AFAIR there was a discussion about a raster shift some month ago regarding RasterLayer class. In my experience, whenever I made an operation with Sextante on Images there is a small shift (0.5 pixel, if I am not wrong). peppe 2013/8/23 > right, top left seems good now, but what about bottom rig

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-24 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, Bottom right is wrong with GeoImage reader. There is one whole pixel shift as if the image is considered to be one pixel smaller in both directions. (#columns-1) by (#rows-1) pixels. Should I read the code so that the GeoTIFF reader is creating a TFW file for interim use? If so, can you cap

Re: [JPP-Devel] OpenJUMP SVN

2013-08-24 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hi Peppe, so does it work for you now? In case not: - I use subversive plugin for eclipse with the java-based driver: SVNKit 1.7.5. - in the URL field I have: svn+ssh://svn.code.sf.net/p/jump-pilot/code/ sorry for the late response. I was in La Serena for 2 days. salduos, stefan Am 22.08.13

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-24 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi Ede, > spoke to soon.. whatever i try the image stays 0.5 pixel shifted.. > > Michael, Stefan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNahS3OHPwA ;-) thanks, the Beatle's song made my day. One year ago, I have fixed a 0.5 pixel offset problem in GraphicImage. I had also to change something in WorldFile

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-24 Thread edgar . soldin
On 24.08.2013 20:03, Michaël Michaud wrote: > Hi Ede, >> spoke to soon.. whatever i try the image stays 0.5 pixel shifted.. >> >> Michael, Stefan: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZNahS3OHPwA > ;-) thanks, the Beatle's song made my day. pleasure is all mine :) > One year ago, I have fixed a 0.5 pix

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-24 Thread edgar . soldin
Ok, maybe now. there was a weird -1 computation for the envelope, who knows why? rev.3683 looks like it does the job. Jukka, can you verify that? ..ede On 24.08.2013 15:27, Rahkonen Jukka wrote: > Hi, > > Bottom right is wrong with GeoImage reader. There is one whole pixel shift as > if the i

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-24 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Hi all, joining the discussion late ;) Yes, there was some pixel off-set problems. But I hope this was fixed long time ago (and repeatedly as Michael wrote). The only way to check is by comparing to existing vector data, maybe some derived from sextante (as it is an independent process). At leas

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-24 Thread edgar . soldin
On 24.08.2013 20:38, Stefan Steiniger wrote: > Now I am gonna have a look at the video you guys send. just a cry for help at a late hour .. wrapped in good music .. ede -- Introducing Performance Central, a new site from

Re: [JPP-Devel] OJ image support

2013-08-24 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, It is not totally weird. It is possible to think that pixels in a raster world are tied to points in the vector world and that each pixel is presenting some average of an attribute value for the points. Digital elevation model in GeoTIFF format is one common example. Then it is rather natur

[JPP-Devel] Improvement to GeoTIFF reader

2013-08-24 Thread Rahkonen Jukka
Hi, The Geotiff reader does now - examine if tiff image contains geotiff tags - if not, check if tfw file can be found - if not, send an error and quit. It would be often fine just to see the image, even if it is not georeferenced. How about to make OpenJUMP to use a default tfw file if image is