[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #516 RemodelerTool not correct

2020-11-30 Thread michael michaud via Jump-pilot-devel
- **status**: open --> pending - **Comment**: Should be fixed. Waiting for feedback from a known user. --- ** [bugs:#516] RemodelerTool not correct** **Status:** pending **Milestone:** OJ_1.16 **Created:** Wed Nov 25, 2020 11:29 AM UTC by michael michaud **Last Updated:** Wed Nov 25, 2020

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #382 Delete Incremental Warping Vector tool does not work

2020-11-30 Thread michael michaud via Jump-pilot-devel
- **status**: open --> closed-fixed --- ** [bugs:#382] Delete Incremental Warping Vector tool does not work** **Status:** closed-fixed **Milestone:** OJ_1.16 **Created:** Mon Nov 24, 2014 04:24 PM UTC by Jukka Rahkonen **Last Updated:** Wed Oct 28, 2020 10:53 AM UTC **Owner:** nobody With

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #511 CropWarp raster plugin can't overload existing file

2020-11-30 Thread michael michaud via Jump-pilot-devel
- **Milestone**: OJ_1.16 --> OJ_future - **Comment**: Thank Peppe, I let it opened as it may probably be fixed in a better way, but it can be postponed to version 2. Currently, a first dialog ask the user if he wants to overwrite the existing file. If yes, the user is informed it is not

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #512 Georeferenced RasterImage : useless dialog to create a worlfile

2020-11-30 Thread michael michaud via Jump-pilot-devel
- **status**: pending --> closed-fixed --- ** [bugs:#512] Georeferenced RasterImage : useless dialog to create a worlfile** **Status:** closed-fixed **Milestone:** OJ_1.16 **Created:** Wed Nov 11, 2020 08:29 AM UTC by michael michaud **Last Updated:** Mon Nov 30, 2020 07:56 PM UTC **Owner:**

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #512 Georeferenced RasterImage : useless dialog to create a worlfile

2020-11-30 Thread Giuseppe Aruta via Jump-pilot-devel
- **status**: open --> pending --- ** [bugs:#512] Georeferenced RasterImage : useless dialog to create a worlfile** **Status:** pending **Milestone:** OJ_1.16 **Created:** Wed Nov 11, 2020 08:29 AM UTC by michael michaud **Last Updated:** Mon Nov 30, 2020 07:53 PM UTC **Owner:** nobody

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #512 Georeferenced RasterImage : useless dialog to create a worlfile

2020-11-30 Thread Giuseppe Aruta via Jump-pilot-devel
Michael- Will you close this ticket? Or shall I do? --- ** [bugs:#512] Georeferenced RasterImage : useless dialog to create a worlfile** **Status:** open **Milestone:** OJ_1.16 **Created:** Wed Nov 11, 2020 08:29 AM UTC by michael michaud **Last Updated:** Mon Nov 23, 2020 01:47 PM UTC

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #513 displaying raster layers in a correct way

2020-11-30 Thread Giuseppe Aruta via Jump-pilot-devel
- **status**: open --> closed-fixed --- ** [bugs:#513] displaying raster layers in a correct way** **Status:** closed-fixed **Milestone:** OJ_1.16 **Labels:** raster display **Created:** Wed Nov 11, 2020 12:35 PM UTC by Giuseppe Aruta **Last Updated:** Mon Nov 30, 2020 07:52 PM UTC

[JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] #513 displaying raster layers in a correct way

2020-11-30 Thread Giuseppe Aruta via Jump-pilot-devel
I am going to close this bug as it has already solved by Michael's last modification on RasterImageLayer framework. --- ** [bugs:#513] displaying raster layers in a correct way** **Status:** open **Milestone:** OJ_1.16 **Labels:** raster display **Created:** Wed Nov 11, 2020 12:35 PM UTC by

Re: [JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #515 Raster display in low memory situation

2020-11-30 Thread edgar . soldin
the bug is already tagged OJ_future so no hurry there. we still got 5 open OJ 1.16 bugs[1] which look like they might be solved already.. ede [1] https://t1p.de/oix8 On 11/30/2020 10:40, giuseppe.ar...@gmail.com wrote: > Hi, > I agree with Michael that ij this step we can consider a good

Re: [JPP-Devel] [jump-pilot:bugs] Re: #515 Raster display in low memory situation

2020-11-30 Thread giuseppe . aruta
Hi, I agree with Michael that ij this step we can consider a good result to have a better RasterImageLayer framework for this three reasons: it if faster in opening images, it requires less ram, it can open more TIF versions than before. Possibly we can postpone, as Michael suggests, to rewrite