Paul,
Finally, I found lastSetSize attribute, changed it to lastSize and
updated Buoy to 1.8
Thanks,
Michaël
Michaël Michaud a écrit :
>Hi Paul
>
>Did you really find such a method in OpenJUMP and in Buoy library ?
>I' can't find that !
>
>Michaël
>
>Paul Austin a écrit :
>
>
>
>>Michaël,
>
Hi Paul
Did you really find such a method in OpenJUMP and in Buoy library ?
I' can't find that !
Michaël
Paul Austin a écrit :
>Michaël,
>
>There is a small problem with the latest versions of buoy, they renamed
>lastSaveSize to lastSize.
>
>I think we should upgrade to the latest version and
Michaël,
There is a small problem with the latest versions of buoy, they renamed
lastSaveSize to lastSize.
I think we should upgrade to the latest version and make this code change.
Paul
Michaël Michaud wrote:
Hi,
Can't remember about Buoy.
Around version 1.6, but it seems to work with las
SS,
I've been working on the maven script for open jump. In maven you define
the list of dependencies and their versions. We could use this as the
list of libraries we use. There maybe even a way to suck the information
out of this file to produce a web page.
Related to this at some point I
I wouldn't have a problem putting the list in the SVN. It is probably
a more logical spot than the wiki.
The Sunburned Surveyor
On 7/2/07, Jan-Oliver Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Samstag, 30. Juni 2007, Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> > Would it be possible to put together a list on the Ope
On Samstag, 30. Juni 2007, Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
> Would it be possible to put together a list on the OpenJUMP wiki that
> identifies each library used with OpenJUMP, which version is required
> for the stable release, what the library is required for, and the
> license it is released under?
I
Would it be possible to put together a list on the OpenJUMP wiki that
identifies each library used with OpenJUMP, which version is required
for the stable release, what the library is required for, and the
license it is released under?
I can set this page up if someone can help me fill it out. We
> Jan-Oliver Wagner has posted that the ERMapper license phrase "at no
> charge to the public" is contradictory with the terms of GPL/LGPL.
> See: http://intevation.de/pipermail/freegis-list/2006-September/002959.html
>
> I don't agree with Jan's interpretation, but I think Stefan did in a
> prev
On Thursday 28 June 2007 18:19, Larry Becker wrote:
> Jan-Oliver Wagner has posted that the ERMapper license phrase "at no
> charge to the public" is contradictory with the terms of GPL/LGPL.
> See: http://intevation.de/pipermail/freegis-list/2006-September/002959.html
>
> I don't agree with Jan's
Hi,
Can't remember about Buoy.
Around version 1.6, but it seems to work with last version (1.8).
It is a public domain lib and as far as I can remember, it is only used
by "simple query" plugin.
Michaël
Paul Austin a écrit :
>Does anyone know what versions of buoy and ermapper we are using?
>
Hi Stefan,
I think you are right on the sun-jai, I think I remember I had to
download older versions under gentoo, but now it does it so I think
distribution is fine.
Where was the ermapper jar download from?
Paul
Larry Becker wrote:
> I think that JAI can be distributed according to the "2.
I think that JAI can be distributed according to the "2. License to
Distribute Software." section. What are you seeing that says
otherwise?
Jan-Oliver Wagner has posted that the ERMapper license phrase "at no
charge to the public" is contradictory with the terms of GPL/LGPL.
See: http://intevati
Does anyone know what versions of buoy and ermapper we are using?
Also do we know what the licensing is for the ermapper jar (i.e. should
we be distributing it).
I think that for the JAI libraries we should also not be distributing
them according to the license, people have to download these th
13 matches
Mail list logo
