On 19.01.2012 08:58, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think the hamcrest-core-1.1.jar can also be removed from the binary
> distributions.
> Can you confirm Benjamin ?
seems to be introduced as junit dependency. let's kick it for distro packages.
> Can't remember which plugin/extension needs
Hi,
I think the hamcrest-core-1.1.jar can also be removed from the binary
distributions.
Can you confirm Benjamin ?
Can't remember which plugin/extension needs js-1.5R4.1.jar which is in
lib directory
of both CORE and PLUS distribution. Anybody knows ?
> you're right, your filtering classes la
On 18.01.2012 23:25, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi Ede,
>
>>> you can add the exclusion to the nosrc configuration
>>> of maven-jar-plugin in pom.xml ;)
>>> i'll doublecheck your change then
>
> done, thanks to check,
it's essentially a
mvn clean package -P release
and checking that the result
Hi Ede,
>> you can add the exclusion to the nosrc configuration
>> of maven-jar-plugin in pom.xml ;)
>> i'll doublecheck your change then
done, thanks to check,
Could you explain to me how the build system knows
if it must execute the nolang or the nosrc configuration.
I did not find referenc
agreed and thanks guys!
stefan
On 18/01/2012 2:34 AM, edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
> On 18.01.2012 08:55, Michaël Michaud wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I just compared the mmdd-rSVN NB and X.Y.Z-rSVN version.
>>
>> So,
>> - mmdd-rSVN is oriented toward contributors (contains source +
>> separate lan
On 18.01.2012 08:55, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just compared the mmdd-rSVN NB and X.Y.Z-rSVN version.
>
> So,
> - mmdd-rSVN is oriented toward contributors (contains source +
> separate language files)
> - X.Y.Z-rSVN is for impatient users (no source, language files bundled
> i
Hi,
I just compared the mmdd-rSVN NB and X.Y.Z-rSVN version.
So,
- mmdd-rSVN is oriented toward contributors (contains source +
separate language files)
- X.Y.Z-rSVN is for impatient users (no source, language files bundled
in the jar)
I think we should remove test files from X.Y.Z and
