Re: [JPP-Devel] Proposal to add MeasureToolbox plugin to OpenJUMP PLUS

2015-11-13 Thread edgar . soldin
On 13.11.2015 01:00, Stefan Steiniger wrote: > (*) I can move the source code to OJ SVN if required where is it currently? ..ede -- ___ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list

Re: [JPP-Devel] Proposal to add MeasureToolbox plugin to OpenJUMP PLUS

2015-11-13 Thread edgar . soldin
Peppe, please do not forget to update http://sourceforge.net/p/jump-pilot/code/HEAD/tree/core/trunk/etc/readme.txt section Additionally PLUS distribution contains ... and the following plugins ..ede On 13.11.2015 16:01, Giuseppe Aruta wrote: > Hi Michaël, Stefan and Ede > thanks for your

Re: [JPP-Devel] Proposal to add MeasureToolbox plugin to OpenJUMP PLUS

2015-11-13 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Hi Michaël, Stefan and Ede thanks for your answer. I will copy MeasureToolbox into OJ Plus. I didin't had time to work around the geodetic transformation, Michael but It is on my priority list. Ede, I add the source code here:

Re: [JPP-Devel] Proposal to add MeasureToolbox plugin to OpenJUMP PLUS

2015-11-12 Thread Michaël Michaud
Hi Peppe, I support your proposition, There has not been much activity this year, but perhaps we should release a new version by the end of the year to be sure all small fixes are included in an official distribution. BTW, did you have any success with your geodetic transformation ? Michaël

[JPP-Devel] Proposal to add MeasureToolbox plugin to OpenJUMP PLUS

2015-11-12 Thread Giuseppe Aruta
Hi, I would like to add MeasureToolbox plugin ( https://sourceforge.net/projects/opensit/files/Openjump/PlugIn/MeasureExtension/) to OpenJUMP PLUS. The tools available on this toolbox should solve at least two important issues for OJ: measure in Geographic coordinates (EPSG4326) and convert

Re: [JPP-Devel] Proposal to add MeasureToolbox plugin to OpenJUMP PLUS

2015-11-12 Thread Stefan Steiniger
Don't have much to vote, I guess, considering my low profile lately, but: +1 Am 12.11.15 um 20:53 schrieb Michaël Michaud: > Hi Peppe, > > I support your proposition, > There has not been much activity this year, but perhaps we should > release a new version by the end of the year to be sure all