Hi,
Yes, bug fix must be our priority until 1.6 release.
I'm not of great help on the MacOS and Linux side though.
I agree with Jukka's proposal about terms item and feature.
and can take care of it, but I'll only change key/values before 1.6,
not class names.
I changed key names and english val
On 23.03.2013 17:17, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
>>Ya, but you cheat, you sent one report twice :-)
> Yes I did twice notification on two bugs ;-)
> On NoteTool, I did a bug report again today because I saw that the 1st bug
> report one was closed and fixed but the bug was not solved on latest OJ NB -
>Ya, but you cheat, you sent one report twice :-)
Yes I did twice notification on two bugs ;-)
On NoteTool, I did a bug report again today because I saw that the 1st bug
report one was closed and fixed but the bug was not solved on latest OJ NB
- Than Ede explained on a mail (time difference betwee
Hi,
I didn't mistake you ;-), what you say is what I feel.
Yesterday a did a course with OJ and I found some small bugs (as you
can see I populate bug tracker in these 2 days)
Ya, but you cheat, you sent one report twice :-)
which I feel it is importantt to solve before 1.6. Than we think about
Hi Ede,
I didn't mistake you ;-), what you say is what I feel.
Yesterday a did a course with OJ and I found some small bugs (as you can
see I populate bug tracker in these 2 days) which I feel it is importantt
to solve before 1.6. Than we think about new features/modifications/etc: I
have a long li
please don't mistake me. i am for these changes, just don't want to tackle them
right now ;)
..ede
On 23.03.2013 14:01, Giuseppe Aruta wrote:
> I also understand Jukka's opinion but it seems for me related to few
> situations. I agree to set as a feature request.
>
> 2013/3/23 mailto:edgar.sol
I also understand Jukka's opinion but it seems for me related to few
situations. I agree to set as a feature request.
2013/3/23
> while i see the point, i don't see the urgency. Jukka, can you please log
> a feature request?
>
> thanks ..ede
>
> On 22.03.2013 18:17, Landon Blake wrote:
> > I thi
while i see the point, i don't see the urgency. Jukka, can you please log a
feature request?
thanks ..ede
On 22.03.2013 18:17, Landon Blake wrote:
> I think Jukka's renaming proposals are valid. Any other comments?
>
> Landon
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
> wrote:
>> Hi,
I think Jukka's renaming proposals are valid. Any other comments?
Landon
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:51 AM, Rahkonen Jukka
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> OpenJUMP has a term "item" which is not the same as "feature". For example
> inner ring of a polygon is an item but not a feature. It seems that our
> copy/
Hi,
OpenJUMP has a term "item" which is not the same as "feature". For example
inner ring of a polygon is an item but not a feature. It seems that our
copy/paste/replicate tools are handling these items which are not features in a
bit different way.
- Create a polygon with a hole, select inner
10 matches
Mail list logo
