I use CVS for work, which is enough to make me a big subversion fan
:-) Atomic commits are the big thing I like, but I'm also a big of
sym-link support. That one isn't a big issue with this code base, I
imagine, but I like it anyways...
-Craig
-
Thanks Sunburned. I read the article linked to in Malte's post. I can see
where Subversion's atomic commit would be important in some environments,
but with the kind of service that I get from SourceForge, I would never get
anything done if I had to start over each time I got an error.
regards,
Malte,
Thanks for posting that link.
We've decided to stick with CVS for the time being. That is the versioning
control system that most of our developers are familiar with, and the
advantages of Subversion aren't great enough at this time to make the
switch. (Another great advantage of Subversi
Hello List,
I just found this weblog about this subject:
http://blogs.oracle.com/duffblog/2007/05/07#a411
By the way, I vote for Subversion although Netbeans support isn't as
good as Eclipse one.
I worked with both Systems and Subversion more intuitive for me.
But maybe I'm getting a more expe
Stefan,
How is you thesis going? I hope well.
You wrote: "And you may remember that i send a link around where somebody
did
compare svn and cvs, and according to this person there is no clear
advantage for either system."
I think there is some small advantages to SVN, at least on the
administra
Stefan
On 4/14/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the same, as michael says, holds for me.
I dont have any feelings against subversion, but why switching to
another systems if everything works fine.
And you may remember that i send a link around where somebody did
compare svn and c
the same, as michael says, holds for me.
I dont have any feelings against subversion, but why switching to
another systems if everything works fine.
And you may remember that i send a link around where somebody did
compare svn and cvs, and according to this person there is no clear
advantage for
O.K. - I'll put you down as a neutral vote...
On 4/13/07, Michaël Michaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are any of the other developers using Subversion? Are there still
> strong feelings against the migration?
No opinion, just like the most simple solution. I prefer having time to
improve jum
> Are any of the other developers using Subversion? Are there still
> strong feelings against the migration?
No opinion, just like the most simple solution. I prefer having time to
improve jump than to configure cvs/svn access :-) .
>
> The Sunburned Surveyor
>
>
>-
While we're talking about upgrading things...I thought I would again mention
the idea of moving our code repository over to Subversion. I have been using
Subversion at the SurveyOS project for a while, and it really has some
advantages over CVS. (You don't need to put in a SourceForge service requ
10 matches
Mail list logo
