is welcome, I would say.
thanks!
Larry Becker schrieb:
> I made an experimental change to LabelStyle to allow vertical alignment
> to work for polygons and not just points and lines. For maps with
> polygon layers that are not "space filling" (i.e. buildings), the
> preferred label position is
Thanks Stefan. I would appreciate feedback from others on how vertical
alignment for polygons affects their work, plugins, or tutorials. If
necessary, I can change the default so that it acts like it did before the
mod (for new layers). Unfortunately, (for existing layers) the default
setting f
Hi, Larry
> Thanks Stefan. I would appreciate feedback from others on how
> vertical alignment for polygons affects their work, plugins, or
> tutorials. If necessary, I can change the default so that it acts
> like it did before the mod (for new layers). Unfortunately, (for
> existing layer
Hi Larry,
thanks for your effort, I think this new function would be a nice and
useful option for labeling!
I don't know if I am getting the problem correctly, but couldn't the
entries of the "vertical alignment"-combobox be changed to "above the
feature", "on the feature" and "below the feat
Hi Nils,
I agree with your analysis except that OJ has no explicit definition of
polygon (or any other geometry type) layers, so setting the default
intelligently does not seem practical. Of course, you could loop though all
of the features for the layer to determine if the layer contained only