Re: [j-nsp] snmpwalk request to obtain the vlan-ids

Dario, I hope someone responded to you offline, if not, here is my feeble attempt to at least get you started in the right direction. Iana considers 802.1q interfaces to have an iftype value equal to 135. (these are the only logical interfaces this router has with a vlan-id configured on them)

Re: [j-nsp] J4350/6350 experiences?

I hear there is a ChDS3 PIM coming for the Jx350 series. Has anyone else heard of release dates for this yet ? On Tuesday 20 February 2007 11:36 am, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > I think it makes more sense to compare the J6350 to the ISR

Re: [j-nsp] J4350/6350 experiences?

Once upon a time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I think it makes more sense to compare the J6350 to the ISR 3800 in > terms of functionality. The J6350 might have the upper hand in term of > pure performance but it certainly looses when it comes to > functionality and available modu

[j-nsp] Re : Re: J4350/6350 experiences?

Peter, I think it makes more sense to compare the J6350 to the ISR 3800 in terms of functionality. The J6350 might have the upper hand in term of pure performance but it certainly looses when it comes to functionality and available modules. Regards, - Message d'origine - De: "Peter

Re: [j-nsp] Transparent Proxy

I can do this maybe tomorrow if you can email me to remind me ;-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ed Ronayne Sent: Tue 2/20/2007 4:21 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] Transparent Proxy Hi all, Long time reader first time poster.

Re: [j-nsp] Transparent Proxy

On Feb 20, 2007, at 10:21 AM, Ed Ronayne wrote: > Hi all, > Long time reader first time poster. > > over the last two months I have started changing a lot of our Cisco > 7200's out with the new J6350. All things going well so far. I was > wondering if anyone could share a quick config

Re: [j-nsp] juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 51, Issue 24

I will be out of office in the period from 19 February 2007 to 1 March 2007. I will have limited or no access to my email. For any technical issue, please contact my colleague Eng. Ahmed Abd Elghany, Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mobile: 0106070991. My mobile will be available for emergency. __

[j-nsp] Transparent Proxy

Hi all, Long time reader first time poster. over the last two months I have started changing a lot of our Cisco 7200's out with the new J6350. All things going well so far. I was wondering if anyone could share a quick config snipit for implementing a transparent proxy. I want to r

Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

Sorry folks, not sure where this hid for all that time! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leigh Porter Sent: 20 February 2007 14:17 To: Pekka Savola; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX It is

Re: [j-nsp] Optical integration - optical IMUX

It is crazy pricing I am seeing even for 10G interfaces. I'm stuck with trunked 1G interfaces and it makes my racks look all messy. What happened to the super-cheap optics for 10G? -- Leigh -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pekka Savola Se

Re: [j-nsp] iBGP convergence time

On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 04:13:27AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: >> You know I haven't had any free time to run real tests or anything, but I >> noticed a significant increase in BGP convergence time when upgrading from >> JUNOS 7.2/7.3 (and