Re: [j-nsp] MLPPP link drop brings bundle down

I am running the same scenario terminating on a P-AS in L2 mode and have not had any problems regarding the bundle going down if only 1 member T1 goes down. By default, only 1 link needs to be up for the bundle to be labeled as up. The amount of minimum links however is a configurable option.

Re: [j-nsp] Routing engine diagnostics

Raniery, This should not affect your routing/forwarding operations, however it should probably be done during a maintenance window just to be safe. Jared --- Raniery Pontes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everybody, > > > after a power failure on a M40e, I´d like to run > some diagnost

Re: [j-nsp] MLPPP link drop brings bundle down

Chris, Do you have a non-default minimum-links value configured? By default it is set to 1 so you should only require 1 member link to be active to maintain the bundle. Jared --- Chris Cappuccio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With a cisco 1600/2600 router, mlppp config and two > T1 WICs I can dro

[j-nsp] MLPPP link drop brings bundle down

With a cisco 1600/2600 router, mlppp config and two T1 WICs I can drop either T1 and the mlppp link still works--if the other side is also a Cisco. With the same cisco 1600/2600 and mlppp config, if the other side is a juniper with P-ML, the mlppp link completely dies if either T1 is unplugged,

[j-nsp] Routing engine diagnostics

Hello everybody, after a power failure on a M40e, I´d like to run some diagnostics to see if everything is ok with this box. There aren´t important error messages in the log and the router is running just fine. But just in case, I wonder if is a good idea to run "request chassis routing-e