Re: [j-nsp] MPLS-in-MPLS mtu

With 1524 to 1530 of MTU size should works, but remember you will need to increase the MTU on your Switch too.. Greetings :) Jonas Frey escribió: > Jared, > > i've done this on most of my network. However the 12 port FE pic > (P/PE-12FE-TX) only does 1532 bytes max MTU (and this only with newer

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS-in-MPLS mtu

Jared, i've done this on most of my network. However the 12 port FE pic (P/PE-12FE-TX) only does 1532 bytes max MTU (and this only with newer firmware...). This is why i am asking. Regards, Jonas On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 23:17, Jared Mauch wrote: > there should be no reason you can't increase

Re: [j-nsp] MPLS-in-MPLS mtu

there should be no reason you can't increase your 'mpls infrastructure' MTU to something larger, eg: 4470 or otherwise. Some providers have gone as far as increasing the internal MTU to the 9k range. This can have some serious wins in some cases, eg: tcp performance as it relates to ibgp

[j-nsp] route selection using BGP communities

hi, I have two upstream providers i am running BGP , i am receiving prefixes with BGP community TAG from my customer's router he want to select one of my up stream provider for out going . currently route selection is on AS PATH Length. what configuration should I do to send the traffic using com

[j-nsp] MPLS-in-MPLS mtu

Hello, i'am looking to deploy a vlan-ccc l2circuit (via MPLS). The customer wants to use MPLS himself on this circuit so i am wondering what MTU would be needed for this to work. I am calculating with 1526 bytes, is this correct? Any help appreciated. Regards, Jonas

[j-nsp] Conditional advertisting to an upstream

Apologies if this is a basic question - I feel that I should be able to figure this out, but have only confused myself more. We have the following topo: -- || || || (th