Could we please have som configuration excerpts?
Right now the only similar scenario I can come up
with was when I was doing iBGP over GRE, but then
I made the mistake of terminating both the GRE and
the iBGP session on the other routers loopback and
so it failed. Since this is an eBGP session
Hi Dan
So using an AS PIC packets will be reassembled at the end of a
tunnel and there are no problems with MPLS traffic also?
Thank you for your reply
Best regards
Ruslan
Thu, 3 May 2007 21:09:51 -0700
Dan Rautio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ruslan,
M-series tunnel pic there is no way to
Hi Scott,
This error message means that the far end is sending packets with the
source of 10.255.255.2 and the AS number 7963. In your config, there
is no peer with that config. I suspect that you're probably using a
different address for that peer. If you have direct connectivity to
that peer
In theory, I'd agree with you, but that's not the case (I'd have to smack
myself for overlooking that one!):
group STDIO {
type external;
traceoptions {
file STDIO;
flag packets send receive detail;
}
Hi Scott
On 04/05/07, Scott Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Notice the traceoptions in the config there. Here is the ENTIRE file (yes,
the date/time on the router is accurate):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] show log STDIO
Apr 13 15:48:53 trace_on: Tracing to /var/log/STDIO started
Apr 13
First remove authentication and try again
Naminda
Sent by dialog blackberry
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Sent: Fri May 04 21:30:08 2007
Subject: juniper-nsp Digest, Vol 54, Issue 6
Send
Hello,
We're experiencing a strange behaviour in one of our M10s.
The router (which is handling the full routing table) seems to keep
forwarding packets, but it's almost impossible to telnet to it, and it
shows 70% packet loss when pinging to a directly connected router. It
also shows 5x
Date: Fri, 4 May 2007 17:10:22 +0100 (WEST)
From: Carlos Friacas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
We're experiencing a strange behaviour in one of our M10s.
The router (which is handling the full routing table) seems to keep
forwarding packets, but it's almost
Hi Scott,
You are right. I'm obviously not thinking clearly. But it appears to
say that it was administratively reset and reset by the management
session...
Apr 18 23:12:37.048543 bgp_peer_mgmt_clear: NOTIFICATION sent to
10.255.255.2 (External AS 7963): code 6 (Cease) subcode 4
Well, how entirely psychotic is that??? :)
Adding the peer-as to the neighbor (not group) AND multihop made it come up.
#$*#$*ing things. Thanks! I'll have to keep that in my reprotoire of
oddball troubleshooting magic!
Thanks everyone for their help and questions making sure I wasn't going
10 matches
Mail list logo
