Re: [j-nsp] 802.3ah OAM support and monitoring

2007-05-30 Thread matthew johnson
Hi David, AFAIK from the testing I have done and my understanding the 802.3ah OAM support on the T-series routers I do not think you have the options to send traps. As the T-series routers are core routers they were not expected to use this functionallity which is fundamentaly for testing the last

Re: [j-nsp] Strange error on AS PIC

2007-05-30 Thread Dan Rautio
Hi Gokhan, It appears your as pic is running out of memory. Have you made any config changes lately that would increase the load on the pic? - Dan > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gökhan Gümüs > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 9:48

Re: [j-nsp] Virtual Router

2007-05-30 Thread Guy Davies
As Chuck pointed out, though, the separation is far from complete. For example, if user A logs into logical-router A and starts modifying the config for logical-router A, then user B logs into logical-router B and modifies the config for logical-router B then does a commit, he will commit *all* cha

Re: [j-nsp] Virtual Router

2007-05-30 Thread nachocheeze
You can set up some tacacs or radius AAA stuff that would allow them view/configure access to various sections of the logical router only, if that's what you are trying to do. Using a combo of various user privs in the router system/login section and various allow/deny statements in a tacacs.conf

[j-nsp] Strange error on AS PIC

2007-05-30 Thread Gökhan Gümüş
Hi guys, I have a strange problem with our AS PIC.We are using that AS PIC card for NAT operation for our L3 VPN customers.In these days NAT operation is not working on some specific customers.I am using JUNOS 7.6 R4.3. When NAT doesnt work,i get this output. [EMAIL PROTECTED]> show services sta

Re: [j-nsp] Re : juniper - cisco l2circuit problem

2007-05-30 Thread Phil Bedard
You need something other than just the PFC on the MPLS core facing side, otherwise it won't work on a SVI (local switching). Phil On May 30, 2007, at 6:05 AM, Atanas Yankov wrote: > Its Wrong you don't need to OSM modules on SUP720 u can use xconnect > vlan100 , the problem is was on Juniper

[j-nsp] Re : Re: Re : juniper - cisco l2circuit problem

2007-05-30 Thread hritter
Atanas, You do not need an OSM+/SIP400/SIP600/ES20 if you put the xconnect on the physical interface or logical subinterface but you absolutely need one of these modules if you configure the xconnect on the SVI interface (aka vlan interface). Cheers, - Message d'origine - De: Atanas Ya

Re: [j-nsp] Re : juniper - cisco l2circuit problem

2007-05-30 Thread sthaug
> Its Wrong you don't need to OSM modules on SUP720 u can use xconnect > vlan100 , the problem is was on Juniper side it cannot receive vlan > interface for attachment circuit :)) Not sure what you mean here - VLAN based Martini tunnels between Cisco and Juniper work just fine. Steinar Haug, Net

Re: [j-nsp] Re : juniper - cisco l2circuit problem

2007-05-30 Thread Atanas Yankov
Its Wrong you don't need to OSM modules on SUP720 u can use xconnect vlan100 , the problem is was on Juniper side it cannot receive vlan interface for attachment circuit :)) On Fri, 2007-04-06 at 02:17 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Christian, > > If you want to use EoMPLS xconnect on a SVI (