[j-nsp] Carrier of Carrier VPNs

Dear fellows, If anybody can help me or can give me an advice I'll be very grateful. I had strange problem with Carrier of Carrier VPN using Juniper M320 provider core with junos 8.1R1.5 and Cisco Catalyst 6506 Sup720+ OSM. I'm using LDP and OSPF between CE-PE and PE and the only problem is

Re: [j-nsp] Network Configuration Management

We use a combination of RANCID and Solarwinds Cirrus Configuration Manager. Cirrus allows you to run command scripts, check Cisco router inventory, find IPs in the network, and many other things: http://www.solarwinds.net/products/Cirrus/index.aspx If you don't have the programming experience ne

Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS support

Hello, Another workaround which we used (and got from this list as well) is to configure "dummy" static routes Something like route 172.16.80.1/32 next-hop 172.16.80.1 Also vrf-table label does not work on 100% of the pics, I don't have a reference to the pic matrix, but I recall we had a pro

Re: [j-nsp] Network Configuration Management

For config backups and revisioning I usually use RANCID combined with some scripts that parse the downloaded configs, pull the serial number data out and stick it in a database somewhere -- this is primarily to make sure that I don't redeploy a known defective card (or a card that gets ship

Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS support

> You need to use eighter vrf-table-label in the routing instance, or > configure a vt- interface with family inet and mpls (no addresses) and > put it in the instance to have your 'direct' route(s) installed in > your mpls cloud. family mpls is not needed on the vt-interface, family inet is enou

Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS support

Hey, You need to use eighter vrf-table-label in the routing instance, or configure a vt- interface with family inet and mpls (no addresses) and put it in the instance to have your 'direct' route(s) installed in your mpls cloud. Please note that you'll need a services pic for vt- interface. Ch

Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS support

table-label option in routing-instance must fix it -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Leigh Porter Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 2:05 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS support Hey folks, When using MPLS on JUNOS

Re: [j-nsp] BGP VPLS support

Hey folks, When using MPLS on JUNOS a directly connected interface route on a PE router is only assigned a label if there is a route on the PE router that uses this interface (static or OSPF or BGP). When a route is present that uses this interface then a label is assigned and the route makes it i