Re: [j-nsp] Strange latency when using traceroute.

Hi Alex, My first thought was BGP, since we're using mostly Cisco gear, but even with BGP having less than 50 routes (in a lab), I saw the issue. Since the J6350 has not yet hit the full production stage, I haven't had a chance to really evaluate the CPU usage, but even now the CPU is idling

Re: [j-nsp] Strange latency when using traceroute.

I have noticed this on J4350s as well (the J4350s are hop 3 and 4): 1<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms vpn-aggr1-117gre.dtdesign.com.au [202.92.250.50] 2<1 ms<1 ms<1 ms fe-0-0-0.core1.117gre.dtdesign.com.au [202.92.250.1] 3 10 ms 9 ms 9 ms ge-0-0-3.border1.190cit.dtdesi

[j-nsp] Strange latency when using traceroute.

Hi all, I've noticed that when traceroute passes through our J6350 (using 8.3R15), that the returned latency is considerably higher from the router. Pinging the router or devices past it are fine, but this is one of those things I know I'll be asked about, and I haven't been able to figure ou

[j-nsp] Problem exporting BGP routes.

Hi all, I'm having an issue exporting routes to iBGP peers. I am able to import routes from my iBGP peers fine, but not export. I have tried several variations on policy statements which effect exactly what is being exported, but without the intended result (exporting a full table). Below I