[j-nsp] STM-4 and Gig LACP Connectivity between Juniper and Cisco gear

Hi, I am planning to get Juniper router and fit between two Cisco gear. Since I don't have any practical knowledge in juniper gear and junos, I would like to know expert opinion on any known issues working between Cisco and Juniper, STM and Gig interface and configs as per below figure.

Re: [j-nsp] STM-4 and Gig LACP Connectivity between Juniper and Ciscogear

Hi Samit, Not all of Cisco's support LACP, some PAGP only which is Cisco proprietary. In this case you should configure Cisco in on mode and deactivate LACP on Juniper. Regards, Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samit

Re: [j-nsp] iBGP impacting eBGP

Hi everyone, thanks for your suggestions. The problem's been solved following Chris's suggestion on using aggregate routes. the iBGP session was originally used by the M7i to advertise some outer prefixes to its internal peer, and the M7i was not learning anything from its internal peer,

[j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Hi Everyone, CAn anyone suggest me how to load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost paths. BR// HA __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com

Re: [j-nsp] iBGP impacting eBGP

Hi Chris, thanks for your input. I followed your suggestion regarding the aggregate routes and it seems to be working just fine now. As for the PREFIX_OUT policy it was already the way you suggested so no change needed there. Thanks again ! Le 5 nov. 07 à 18:50, Chris Kawchuk a écrit :

Re: [j-nsp] load balancing between juniper routers for unequal cost path

Build 2 MPLS LSPs to the destination router, turn on OSPF on those shortcuts, and use ECMP. JunOS will see them as 2 completely identical paths to the end-device, and load-balance across them. Enable ECMP load balancing: routing-options { forwarding-table { export