Re: [j-nsp] [SOLVED] Strange 'commit check' result: re0 fine, re1 not fine

2007-11-26 Thread David Ball
Turns out it was a fat-finger mistake, and I had inadvertently inserted a control character (ctrl-T). The 'syntax error:' was showing me what the mistake wasbut it was an invisible character. Dunno if that's a JunOS bug or not (not warning that I entered a control character), but it's someth

[j-nsp] Strange 'commit check' result: re0 fine, re1 not fine

2007-11-26 Thread David Ball
Just created a bunch of new policies on a T640 running 8.2R1.7 for an upcoming maintenance I'm doing, and a commit check is failing strangely: # commit check re0: configuration check succeeds re1: error: syntax error: re0: error: remote load-configuration failed on re1 We've had 'commit synchro

Re: [j-nsp] Link agg with ports on different FPCs ?

2007-11-26 Thread Sean Clarke
Hi David .. yes this is supported across multiple FPC's (and is the normal way of doing this I would say, for port/pic/fpc redundancy) cheers Sean David Ball wrote: > Anyone know if there are restrictions regarding what ports can be > used in an aggregated ethernet bundle on a T640? Meaning

[j-nsp] Link agg with ports on different FPCs ?

2007-11-26 Thread David Ball
Anyone know if there are restrictions regarding what ports can be used in an aggregated ethernet bundle on a T640? Meaning, can I use 2 Gig IQ2 ports that reside on different FPCs in the same bundle? I've tested ports on different PICs on the same FPC successfully, but I don't have another FPC