Re: [j-nsp] OSPF Sham link question

2007-12-06 Thread Daniel Lete
Hello David, Your comment below: (NB: is it normal that the routes PE2 is learning from the m10 are 'Extern' ?) may not be related at all with sham links or even with rfc2547/rfc4364. If you are injecting prefixes into OSPF (redistribute in Cisco or export in Juniper) in your CE, then

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF Sham link question

2007-12-06 Thread Sergio D.
But you should at least be learning the loopbacks from each side as a type-1 LSA. How are these routes showing on the PEs show route protocol ospf table sham-link-test ? I think I missed that output or sorry if it was already mentioned. Message: 4 Date: Thu, 06 Dec 2007 15:04:03 + From:

Re: [j-nsp] Apparent m40 RPD memory leak

2007-12-06 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 06:13:06PM -0800, Jared Gillis wrote: Hi all, I've been scratching my head over a problem with steadily increasing memory usage by rpd on our m40 routers. Yes I know this is a halfass joke solution, but you could always fire up some /sbin/swapon to increase swap

Re: [j-nsp] OSPF Sham link question

2007-12-06 Thread David Ball
On the T640 facing the m10 which is originating some routes: # run show ospf route instance sham-link-test Prefix Path Route NH Metric NextHop Nexthop Type TypeType Interface addr/label 172.16.0.3 Intra Router IP