[j-nsp] GE/10GE link-mode config on M/T-series has no effect

Hi, Just as a heads-up, apparently GE/10GE 'link-mode full-duplex' configuration on M/T-series routers has no effect, the interface stays with auto-negotiate. Some versions of current software report warnings on commits to syslog but these warnings are being removed. The configuration syntax

[j-nsp] (no subject)

___ juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp

Re: [j-nsp] GE/10GE link-mode config on M/T-series has no effect

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:21:53AM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: It is a requirement of the GigE standard to do autonegotiation. Turning it off would be a violation of the standard. Besides, when was the last time you saw a GigE PHY that supported Half-Duplex? Autonegotiation on GigE is

Re: [j-nsp] GE/10GE link-mode config on M/T-series has no effect

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 12:00:50PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 08:21:53AM -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote: It is a requirement of the GigE standard to do autonegotiation. Turning it off would be a violation of the standard. Besides, when was the last time you

Re: [j-nsp] GE/10GE link-mode config on M/T-series has no effect

Hi, Recently I have been confronted to the same problem on a J4350. Here was the answer : http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/junos/junos85/swconfig85-network-interfaces/id-12174099.html#id-12174099 There is a mistake on this page. You can read : Note: For Gigabit Ethernet interfaces

Re: [j-nsp] Watchguard - SSG550M VPN

Sven, I have had this issue with the watchguards for years. The only way I have found to fix the problem consistently is to change the gateway IP address on the netscreen and then change it back to the correct one. This creates a new SA and therefore allows the tunnel to come up. I have spent

[j-nsp] Will PE-2OC3-SON-SMIR work in a M120?

I'm upgrading my M10 to an M120. I currently have an OC-3 circuit that will be going away soonish, so I'd rather not buy the new PB-4OC3-SON-SMIR (needs Type1 FPC) that was quoted for the M120. Can I reuse the PE-2OC3-SON-SMIR PIC I have currently in the new M120? What type of FPC would it

Re: [j-nsp] Will PE-2OC3-SON-SMIR work in a M120?

On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 10:30:24PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Benny Sumitro [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The PIC for M10i can only be reused for M5, M10 and M7i. For M120 PIC can only be interchangeable with M40e, M160, M320 and T series. See also: