Re: [j-nsp] Route reflection design consideration

2007-12-13 Thread Stéphane Grosjean
Thanks Peter and Alain, Yes, of course, I'm considering different and unique cluster-id and different groups also. That point was not mentioned in the rfc nor the documentation I went through, but I finally found it in the good old juniper's bible "complete reference". Okay, I can have a rout

Re: [j-nsp] Monitor ppp interface

2007-12-13 Thread Bjørn Mork
"sunnyday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there any way find the ppp interface from this output from a specific > subscriber? > i want for example to see what policies are attached to subscriber test1 > i have done the show ppp int gig 2/6 and could identify the ppp interface but > when i have

[j-nsp] VRRP with Juniper, what is needed around?

2007-12-13 Thread Jeff Meyers
Hello list, we operate a relatively small network with one Juniper M10 router for everything. Since availability becomes more and more important, we want to raise this by installing a second M10 with VRRP. Our current setup is pretty simple: Uplink1 - +-+ - +-+ Uplink2 - | M10

Re: [j-nsp] cflowd ASN lookup

2007-12-13 Thread sthaug
> You also have to configure "routing-options route-record" as well. Note > that this increases your memory and CPU use, and it has to constantly copy > the routing table data from rpd to the sampled process. If you don't need > AS data in your flow export, don't configure this. This may have b

Re: [j-nsp] Route reflection design consideration

2007-12-13 Thread BRIANT Alain
Salut Stephane ... I have never tested this but I think it could work if you have of course separated groups for the two clusters (it's not possible another way) If you have a look at the documentation: "help topic bgp cluster" ... To configure a router to be a route reflector, you must d

Re: [j-nsp] cflowd ASN lookup

2007-12-13 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:31:58AM -0800, Chris Kawchuk wrote: > Ensure your stanza looks something like this: > > forwarding-options { >sampling { >input { >family inet { >rate 10; >run-length 10; >max-packets-per-secon

[j-nsp] Route reflection design consideration

2007-12-13 Thread Stéphane Grosjean
Hi folks, I'm scratching my head with some RR configuration, and I'd like your feeling on it. Is it correct to configure one router to be RR for different clusters? Does it reflects correctly routes from one cluster to another? Let's have an example: You have on one side a dual RR (router A an

Re: [j-nsp] cflowd ASN lookup

2007-12-13 Thread Chris Kawchuk
Ensure your stanza looks something like this: forwarding-options { sampling { input { family inet { rate 10; run-length 10; max-packets-per-second 7000; } } output { cflowd 172.28.1.14 {

Re: [j-nsp] cflowd ASN lookup

2007-12-13 Thread Aden Bos
Hyunseog Ryu wrote: > Did you have BGP routing table copy in your cflowd box, and specify > the location ? > That's the source of learning which AS number matches for which BGP > prefix from flow data. > > Hyun > > Aden Bos wrote: >> Hi, >> I have configured cflowd on an m7i, but the flow data do

Re: [j-nsp] cflowd ASN lookup

2007-12-13 Thread Perry, Andrew
flow does not include this information by nature, it is only the header of the packet basicly so, src/dst IP, src/dst port, size flags (if any) time stamp. you will have to use something that examines bgp info to get AS info like Arbor. Andy Perry Staff Internet Engineer GCIA GCIH GCFW CCNA J

Re: [j-nsp] cflowd ASN lookup

2007-12-13 Thread Hyunseog Ryu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Did you have BGP routing table copy in your cflowd box, and specify the location ? That's the source of learning which AS number matches for which BGP prefix from flow data. Hyun Aden Bos wrote: > Hi, > I have configured cflowd on an m7i, but the fl

[j-nsp] Monitor ppp interface

2007-12-13 Thread sunnyday
Is there any way find the ppp interface from this output from a specific subscriber? i want for example to see what policies are attached to subscriber test1 i have done the show ppp int gig 2/6 and could identify the ppp interface but when i have thousands of subscribers what to do to find the p

[j-nsp] cflowd ASN lookup

2007-12-13 Thread Aden Bos
Hi, I have configured cflowd on an m7i, but the flow data doesn't seem to include the source or destination ASN (shows ASN0), apart from when I am the source or destination. Any ideas what could cause this? Thanks, Aden ___ juniper-nsp mailing list junip

[j-nsp] Monitoring Subscriber Interfaces

2007-12-13 Thread M.Mihailidis
hello based on this output how can i monitor ppp/ip interfaces of specific subscribers??? [EMAIL PROTECTED] GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138 [EMAIL PROTECTED]GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138 [EMAIL PROTECTED] GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138 _

[j-nsp] J-Series ICMP echo delays

2007-12-13 Thread Gniewomir Krol
Hi folks, I've experienced >=10ms delays for ICMP echo requests generated by J-6350 (2 separate devices), but pings to the router from some other devices work smoothly (<1ms). It has no impact on forwarding user traffic, and as for today looks like some special feature ;) BTW, I'm aware of the way

[j-nsp] Monitoring subscriber interfaces

2007-12-13 Thread sunnyday
hello based on this output how can i monitor ppp/ip interfaces of specific subscribers??? [EMAIL PROTECTED] GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138 [EMAIL PROTECTED]GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138 [EMAIL PROTECTED] GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138 _

Re: [j-nsp] 8.2R2.4 -> 8.4R2.4 route installation delay

2007-12-13 Thread Ian MacKinnon
We are seeing something very similar, JUNOS 8.0R2 on M40 Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:50:37PM -0600, Kevin Day wrote: >> Tonight we upgraded from 8.2R2.4 to 8.4R2.4 on a production M20. >> Everything seemed to go well except for one problem that I'm not sure >> I

Re: [j-nsp] RES: Juniper Junos 8.4

2007-12-13 Thread Lukasz Trabinski
Edson Cardoso pisze: Hello > Hi Mario, > We saw this same behavior on a M20 router also... Interfaces, OSPF and BGP > flapping .. Seens that version 8.4R2.3 is not totally stable... We did not > find any PR's related yet.. Please try use "clocking external" in interface configuration if you ha

Re: [j-nsp] RES: Juniper Junos 8.4

2007-12-13 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:16:06AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: > This is not true, MD5 has no relation. The issue is with an invalid BGP > message which Cisco propagates harmlessly (a violation of the BGP spec, > allowing the message to spread), but which Juniper (correctly) detects as >