Thanks Peter and Alain,
Yes, of course, I'm considering different and unique cluster-id and different
groups also.
That point was not mentioned in the rfc nor the documentation I went through,
but I finally found it in the good old juniper's bible "complete reference".
Okay, I can have a rout
"sunnyday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there any way find the ppp interface from this output from a specific
> subscriber?
> i want for example to see what policies are attached to subscriber test1
> i have done the show ppp int gig 2/6 and could identify the ppp interface but
> when i have
Hello list,
we operate a relatively small network with one Juniper M10 router for
everything. Since availability becomes more and more important, we want
to raise this by installing a second M10 with VRRP.
Our current setup is pretty simple:
Uplink1 - +-+ - +-+
Uplink2 - | M10
> You also have to configure "routing-options route-record" as well. Note
> that this increases your memory and CPU use, and it has to constantly copy
> the routing table data from rpd to the sampled process. If you don't need
> AS data in your flow export, don't configure this.
This may have b
Salut Stephane
...
I have never tested this but I think it could work if you have of
course separated groups for the two clusters (it's not possible
another way)
If you have a look at the documentation:
"help topic bgp cluster"
...
To configure a router to be a route reflector, you must d
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 09:31:58AM -0800, Chris Kawchuk wrote:
> Ensure your stanza looks something like this:
>
> forwarding-options {
>sampling {
>input {
>family inet {
>rate 10;
>run-length 10;
>max-packets-per-secon
Hi folks,
I'm scratching my head with some RR configuration, and I'd like your feeling on
it. Is it correct to configure one router to be RR for different clusters? Does
it reflects correctly routes from one cluster to another?
Let's have an example: You have on one side a dual RR (router A an
Ensure your stanza looks something like this:
forwarding-options {
sampling {
input {
family inet {
rate 10;
run-length 10;
max-packets-per-second 7000;
}
}
output {
cflowd 172.28.1.14 {
Hyunseog Ryu wrote:
> Did you have BGP routing table copy in your cflowd box, and specify
> the location ?
> That's the source of learning which AS number matches for which BGP
> prefix from flow data.
>
> Hyun
>
> Aden Bos wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I have configured cflowd on an m7i, but the flow data do
flow does not include this information by nature, it is only the header of the
packet basicly so, src/dst IP, src/dst port, size flags (if any) time stamp.
you will have to use something that examines bgp info to get AS info like Arbor.
Andy Perry
Staff Internet Engineer
GCIA GCIH GCFW CCNA J
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Did you have BGP routing table copy in your cflowd box, and specify
the location ?
That's the source of learning which AS number matches for which BGP
prefix from flow data.
Hyun
Aden Bos wrote:
> Hi,
> I have configured cflowd on an m7i, but the fl
Is there any way find the ppp interface from this output from a specific
subscriber?
i want for example to see what policies are attached to subscriber test1
i have done the show ppp int gig 2/6 and could identify the ppp interface but
when i have thousands of subscribers what to do to find the p
Hi,
I have configured cflowd on an m7i, but the flow data doesn't seem to
include the source or destination ASN (shows ASN0), apart from when I am
the source or destination. Any ideas what could cause this?
Thanks,
Aden
___
juniper-nsp mailing list junip
hello
based on this output how can i monitor ppp/ip interfaces of specific
subscribers???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138
[EMAIL PROTECTED]GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138
[EMAIL PROTECTED] GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138
_
Hi folks,
I've experienced >=10ms delays for ICMP echo requests generated by
J-6350 (2 separate devices), but pings to the router from some other
devices work smoothly (<1ms). It has no impact on forwarding
user traffic, and as for today looks like some special feature ;)
BTW, I'm aware of the way
hello
based on this output how can i monitor ppp/ip interfaces of specific
subscribers???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138
[EMAIL PROTECTED]GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138
[EMAIL PROTECTED] GigabitEthernet 2/0/0.138:138
_
We are seeing something very similar, JUNOS 8.0R2 on M40
Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 08:50:37PM -0600, Kevin Day wrote:
>> Tonight we upgraded from 8.2R2.4 to 8.4R2.4 on a production M20.
>> Everything seemed to go well except for one problem that I'm not sure
>> I
Edson Cardoso pisze:
Hello
> Hi Mario,
> We saw this same behavior on a M20 router also... Interfaces, OSPF and BGP
> flapping .. Seens that version 8.4R2.3 is not totally stable... We did not
> find any PR's related yet..
Please try use "clocking external" in interface configuration if you
ha
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 02:16:06AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> This is not true, MD5 has no relation. The issue is with an invalid BGP
> message which Cisco propagates harmlessly (a violation of the BGP spec,
> allowing the message to spread), but which Juniper (correctly) detects as
>
19 matches
Mail list logo
