These details are very important to anyone who has a keen interest in how
their $250,000 box works.
And, how do you get the idea that the ASICs are "based upon a robust operating
system that is loosely based upon the basic routeD and other open source code" ?
If you actually took the time to read
On Dec 20, 2007 6:47 PM, Evan Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> why concern yourself with these details, at the end of the day it is a quite
> simple concept that Juniper created, that is they have developed the ASICs
> that do the day to day shifting of routed traffic, based upon a robust
> op
why concern yourself with these details, at the end of the day it is a quite
simple concept that Juniper created, that is they have developed the ASICs
that do the day to day shifting of routed traffic, based upon a robust
operating system that is loosely based upon the basic routeD and other op
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:53:49PM +0200, sunnyday wrote:
> my question was about load balancing because i read that at internet
> processor 2 is per flow an plain internet processor is random
It isn't random, but it is per-packet which potentially allows reordering
to occur inside a flow.
The
my question was about load balancing because i read that at internet
processor 2 is per flow an plain internet processor is random
- Original Message -
From: "Richard A Steenbergen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "sunnyday" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Juniper-Nsp"
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 09:07:15PM +0200, sunnyday wrote:
> m320 is using internet processor II or plain internet processor?
Neither. M320 is a Gibson architecture platform (basically its a T320 in a
bigger chassis). The routing ASIC is the R-chip, which is distributed over
the FPCs rather than
Anyway, Should I be save if I upgrade top 7.6R4? The router is only for
testing purposes.
Btw, I seem to only be able to download the 8.x version of JUNOS from the
juniper site. Where can I find the 7.x?
Thanks all for responding!
chiel
- Original Message -
From: "Richard A Steenbergen
sunnyday schrieb:
> m320 is using internet processor II or plain internet processor?
IP2 of course.
--
Accelerated IT Services GmbH
Schubertstrasse 10D-67251 Freinsheim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.accelerated.de/
Telefon: +49 69-25738580-3
m320 is using internet processor II or plain internet processor?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:53:04AM -0800, Shawn Morris wrote:
> We've done some upgrades of both RE3s and RE2s in our lab to 1g. On
> the RE3 it's extremely simple as it's designed to be a FRU. You just
> open a latch and replace the card. On the RE2 you have to remove the
> faceplate and about
We've done some upgrades of both RE3s and RE2s in our lab to 1g. On
the RE3 it's extremely simple as it's designed to be a FRU. You just
open a latch and replace the card. On the RE2 you have to remove the
faceplate and about 5 screws on the bottom to remove the daugtherboard
that the HD sits on
how can i can use the command delete | except
on m series from top of the configuration deleting everything except some
element
for example a certain interface
Cheers
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/
> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:01:13 -0500
> From: "Eric Van Tol" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Downgrading to 7.6 worked for me, which is probably your best
> > bet on the M5/10/20/40 unless you're willing to upgrade the
> > RE's flash and the FEB/SSB SDRAM in a warranty-vo
There should be no reason a 1G CF would not work.
- Jared
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 11:50:09AM +0100, Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> speaking of CF upgrades...anyone here did any yet?
> Wondering how much cf memory the RE(2|3) can handle.
--
Jared Mauch | pgp ke
Hi,
I came across this issue since upgrading from 8.2R2.4 to 8.2 R4.5.
Essentially routers won't always take over as VRRP master. They think they've
taken over but log this error:
Dec 20 11:41:31 x-rtr dcd[3080]: DCD_CONFIG_WRITE_FAILED: configuration
write failed for an RT ADD: Can't a
Hello all
Do some of you can share experience with BFD configured under OSPF or
ISIS on live networks on routers like
M7i or M10i:
- I am wondering what kind of timers you can configure? (Docs are
talking about not less than 300ms)
- How many sessions are active at the same time on the router?
On Dec 20, 2007, at 6:01 AM, Eric Van Tol wrote:
>> Downgrading to 7.6 worked for me, which is probably your best
>> bet on the M5/10/20/40 unless you're willing to upgrade the
>> RE's flash and the FEB/SSB SDRAM in a warranty-voiding kinda way.
>
> Can someone post some more info regarding this,
> Downgrading to 7.6 worked for me, which is probably your best
> bet on the M5/10/20/40 unless you're willing to upgrade the
> RE's flash and the FEB/SSB SDRAM in a warranty-voiding kinda way.
Can someone post some more info regarding this, perhaps with memory
requirements per platform? Will 8
Hello,
speaking of CF upgrades...anyone here did any yet?
Wondering how much cf memory the RE(2|3) can handle.
Regards,
Jonas
On Thu, December 20, 2007 00:53, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 06:09:28PM -0400, chiel wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>>
>> I want to upgrade a M5 from 6
Hello List,
I've an odd problem with packet loss in a VRF. Our setup is similar to
this diagram:
+--+ +-+ +--+
| PE-A |---| P |---| PE-B |
+--+ +-+ +--+
PE-B has two CE routers attached - as a result it
20 matches
Mail list logo
