Hello
Since your problem seems basic
I would advice you to try to connect your M7i to some other kind of
equipment on one hand
And your BD6K switch on the other hand separately
You have a silly physical problem or negotiation problem.
On the M7i side the PE-4FE-TX card is MDI
On the BD6K side
Its not a stupid question, that's how we learn :)
regards,
Umar Ahmed
JNCIE-M # 281, FNCNE, Numpty # 1
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wang dong bei
Sent: 29 January 2008 03:10
To: Paolo Autore
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
hello
i have a question regarding giving vpn access to the internet
i have seen one way to do it is via a shared ip interface.
host1(config)#virtual-router pe1:pe11host1:pe1:pe11(config)#interface ip
internethost1:pe1:pe11(config-if)#ip share-interface gig
2/2.10host1:pe1:pe11(config-if)#ip
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:47:59PM +0300, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
Hi,
noting that these 'switches' will be MPLS-able in this year, so
it can be used not only as 'enterprise switch', but as SP one.
And their EX 4200-24F is always ideally suited for metro ethernet
distribution/access
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sabri Berisha
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 10:56 AM
To: Alexandre Snarskii
Cc: Juniper-NSP Mailing list
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!!
The specs say:
Layer 3 Features: IPv4
Max
I guess this product will compete with Extreme Networks, Foundry, Cisco
Catalyst stuff and some others..
Edson
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tue 29-Jan-08 13:13
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is
Hi Guys,
Why do they have POE on all models, surely nobody in SP environment wants
that?
cheers
/rolf
On Tuesday 29 January 2008 16:47:59 Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:32:37PM -0200, GIULIANO (UOL) wrote:
Be welcome to the new Juniper EX-Series Family of Enterprise
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:55:38PM +0100, Sabri Berisha wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 06:47:59PM +0300, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
Hi,
noting that these 'switches' will be MPLS-able in this year, so
it can be used not only as 'enterprise switch', but as SP one.
And their EX 4200-24F is
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:32:37PM -0200, GIULIANO (UOL) wrote:
Be welcome to the new Juniper EX-Series Family of Enterprise
Class Switches:
http://www.juniper.net/index.html
Impressive. Especially footnote about Advanced Feature License:
AFL including IPv6 Routing, IS-IS, BGP, MBGP, MPLS,
Did juniper buy out another switching company or is this their
design from the ground up?
It is their design from the ground up.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:32:37PM -0200, GIULIANO (UOL) wrote:
Be welcome to the new Juniper EX-Series Family of Enterprise
Class Switches:
http://www.juniper.net/index.html
It'll be interesting to hear juniper folks compare it to the crisco
nexus that was announced yesterday/
--
4 models of 3200s and 5 models of 4200s, some having all POE ports
and others having only 1/3 of the ports supporting POE. Doesn't sound
unreasonable to me, as they're likely trying to cover a broader
customer base. 9 models of wiring-closet switches from a historically
router-only vendor
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Joe Provo wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:32:37PM -0200, GIULIANO (UOL) wrote:
Be welcome to the new Juniper EX-Series Family of Enterprise
Class Switches:
http://www.juniper.net/index.html
It'll be interesting to hear juniper folks compare it to the crisco
nexus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Rolf Mendelsohn
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 11:02 AM
To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [j-nsp] The Switch is ON !!!
Hi Guys,
Why do they have POE on all models, surely nobody in
Actually he can speak for us on this one, too. I asked my cohort here
what devices we had in our datacenters that would need POE... you know
what I heard?
... cricket...
I told a vendor rep recently that there is no way we would ever buy POE
switches for our hosting work... and now he's smiling
And unless you are on only certain particular devices (e.g. L3 switches)
then the end device won't necessarily have any relevant clue what VLAN it's
on.
I have never seen/heard of an RFC for it either and would certainly wonder
WHY?. :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wonder if the EX4200 can have layer 3 on all ports. A 48 port GigE
router would be nice, I just ordered two Cisco 3750G-Es for that
exact purpose. I like the stacking capabilities of the EX4200
-Matt
On Jan 29, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Scott Morris wrote:
These aren't core... If you're
It does make sense though. Say one megabits interface with 20 VLANs. In that
scenario, every VLAN, usually has own link-local address. It is more practical
than multiple interfaces with same link-local address.
I found this on Juniper router and now assume it is Juniper specific
This makes it more useful than the Nexus. MPLS = good.
Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:32:37PM -0200, GIULIANO (UOL) wrote:
Be welcome to the new Juniper EX-Series Family of Enterprise
Class Switches:
http://www.juniper.net/index.html
Impressive. Especially
I'm trying to build a site-to-site IPSec tunnel with two J-4350's, but
I'm running into a strange issue.
The tunnel appears to be up, the two routers see each other as neighbors
in OSPF, I can even ping between the two routers.
In addition a host on one side can ping a host on the other side.
This makes it more useful than the Nexus. MPLS = good.
If youre looking at using it in an SP environment, yes.
But the Nexus isnt targeted at SP environments...
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 10:01:08AM -0500, Dorian Kim wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 09:41:01AM -0500, Joe Provo wrote:
It'll be interesting to hear juniper folks compare it to the crisco
nexus that was announced yesterday/
Bit of apples and oranges comparison between the two
Obviously
22 matches
Mail list logo
