[j-nsp] Juniper SDX-300 (interoperability with thrid party products like Cisco)

2008-04-18 Thread P.Narayana Swamy
Hi, Though, the SDX-300 supports COPS / BEEP sessions, It can support only JunosE and Junos ( Both ERX and M-series). Eventhough the controlling session is COPS, the Command line are different for other vendors. Swamy. Dear All I am currently evaluating Juniper SDX-300 software along with

[j-nsp] redistribute ospf into ISIS

2008-04-18 Thread Plz
upinkuplink | | | | RouterA-RouterB \ / \/ \ / RouterC so ,that's is the topology. router A,B,C runs ospf router A,B, and uplink router runs ISIS routerC 's loopback0 is

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper SDX-300 (interoperability with thrid party products like Cisco)

2008-04-18 Thread Bjørn Mork
P.Narayana Swamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Though, the SDX-300 supports COPS / BEEP sessions, It can support only JunosE and Junos ( Both ERX and M-series). Eventhough the controlling session is COPS, the Command line are different for other vendors. It can be used, in theory, to manage

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper SDX-300 (interoperability with thrid partyproducts like Cisco)

2008-04-18 Thread ZhangHong
The recent version (SRC-PE 2.x) support CoA, and can be used to manage the 3rd part devices which support CoA. - Original Message - From: Bjørn Mork [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: P.Narayana Swamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 8:04 PM Subject:

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX

2008-04-18 Thread Eric Van Tol
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Ball Sent: Tuesday, April 15, 2008 10:54 PM To: Rubens Kuhl Jr. Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX I sat through the EX presentation given by our

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX

2008-04-18 Thread David Ball
Hi Eric. Aviva Garrett (of JunOS Cookbook fame) monitors this list a bit from what I've seen, and has taken suggestions in the past. I'm sure any corrections you point out won't fall on deaf ears. David On 18/04/2008, Eric Van Tol [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message-

Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX

2008-04-18 Thread Eric Van Tol
-Original Message- From: David Ball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 12:15 PM To: Eric Van Tol Cc: Rubens Kuhl Jr.; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: Re: [j-nsp] Juniper EX Hi Eric. Aviva Garrett (of JunOS Cookbook fame) monitors this list a bit from

[j-nsp] Configuration Groups question...

2008-04-18 Thread Stefan Fouant
Does anyone know if I can use Regular Expressions to match on a particular field in order to determine if I want to have the apply-group settings apply to a particular object? For example, if I had several interfaces in my system which had Transit in their description, could I do match on this in

Re: [j-nsp] Configuration Groups question...

2008-04-18 Thread Erdem Sener
Hi Stefan, Your groups configuration will match _all_ the interfaces at this point already: groups { Management { interfaces { * { What you're trying to do is possible via commit scripts, where you can check for special condition/conditions and take action (alter

Re: [j-nsp] Configuration Groups question...

2008-04-18 Thread Chris Spears
If you want to use your description field to elicit a particular configuration, you need to write a commit script that can discern this. You can match on text in the description and do an emit-change to create additional config parameters. see