[j-nsp] (no subject)

Hello I need help with one how do I configure the policy mentioned? I make a dialup from a pc and this is what I get: IKExx.xx.xx.xx Phase 2 msg ID 37ec7e6c: Negotiations have failed.2008-05-19 12:16:18infoIKE85.72.37.175 Phase 2: No policy exists for the proxy ID received: local ID

Re: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:juniper-nsp- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Degtiariov Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:02 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems Hello. I have expected problems with Full view on M10 router. Some

[j-nsp] M10 FEB problems

Hello. I have expected problems with Full view on M10 router. Some of directly (L3 I mean) connected customers can't see anything except his default gateway (there is IP on this M10) In logs I see a log of similar entries: ... May 19 12:54:16 hosto /kernel: RT_PFE: RT msg op 3 (PREFIX CHANGE)

Re: [j-nsp] asn32: as-path formatting ?

On May 17, 2008, at 4:10 AM, Daniel Roesen wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 02:32:42PM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: As numbers greater than 65535, like they freaking should be. :'s don't belong in IP addresses .'s don't belong in ASNs Thank you Juniper. I couldn't agree more.

[j-nsp] NetScreen-Remote issues

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I'm facing recurring issues with the NetScreen-Remote under Windows XP SP2. $SOMETHING every now and then fubars the installation and a formerly working VPN out of the sudden won't budge anymore. Most of the time the client installed

[j-nsp] 10GE xe-0/0/0 traffic anomaly

I have new m120 connected on stick to the Extreme switch. 10GE m120--summit- in=2 x out(??) in=out M120 has only one interface - xe-0/0/0 with many 802.1q subinterfaces. So traffic on xe-0/0/0 should be exactly symmetrical (in/out = 1) but it is not!! Mrtg shows

Re: [j-nsp] M10 FEB problems (Eric Van Tol)

Hi Andrew, Your log indicate new prefix could not be installed in the feb. In my experience, there is no other way than restarting feb. You need to restart them carefully. Be careful, sometimes the old box didn't work properly, so you cannot remote it after restarting feb. Better if you replace

Re: [j-nsp] 10GE xe-0/0/0 traffic anomaly

On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 01:40:57PM +0200, Witold Koscielniak wrote: M120 has only one interface - xe-0/0/0 with many 802.1q subinterfaces. So traffic on xe-0/0/0 should be exactly symmetrical (in/out = 1) but it is not!! Mrtg shows that traffic on 10G summit is exactly symmetrical but on

Re: [j-nsp] 10GE xe-0/0/0 traffic anomaly

Hi Witold, Could this be a bug in the Junos you are running where the counter stats for vlanned interfaces are counted twice before being attributed to the interface? Is it R8.3/8.4 you are running? Regards Bruce -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL