Hi,
We're looking at both the MX and 7600 platforms for our MPLS needs and I
was interested in hearing feedback from people about their experiences -
both positive and negative - with either platforms.
Whatever is selected will be used both as Ps and PEs w/ all 10GE on the
core side. This is
Just because I am curious, neither of the providers or JTAC thought of
the solutions I did?
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 5, 2008, at 11:45 AM, "Lee Hetherington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
Hi All,
I have a very odd problem with a J Series router and wonder if
anyone can help, as neither
Routing loop?
Can you post your bgp config? Also, can you post the routes to the two
addresses you peer with?
P Think before you print
CONFIDENTIALITY: This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain
confidential, proprietary and privileged information, and unauthorized
disclosure o
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 09:51:35AM -0700, Shane Ronan wrote:
> For us uninitiated, what is contained in this API?
At this point there is no real reason to keep running junoscript, it has
been replaced by the standardized multi-vendor version called netconf.
http://www.juniper.net/support/xml/net
Hi,
You may also want to edit your input policy and refine this ANYof
yours a little, such as:
- reject prefixes that are smaller than /24
- reject private addresses
- delete community information that is used (has a meaning) within
your network from the prefixes you receive,
so that you won't _
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Hetherington) [Sat 05 Jul 2008, 20:42 CEST]:
We have a J2320-JH, it has a Link to AS1200 over a 2meg serial x.21
connection and then a 100meg connection to AS1299 over ethernet. I
have bgp from our as accepting ANY from them and announcing a single
/23 network to them.
At 2meg, I'm not sure that would qualify as a good idea even if it were
stable! :) Although I guess that depends on what part of the world you
are in and what tier an ISP we were talking about!
-Original Message-
From: Shane Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 200
You too. Glad I had a chance to contribute to the group, rather then
just asking questions for once.
Shane
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:28 PM, Lee Hetherington wrote:
Thanks for your help both!
I am now only announcing the correct things.
I'll go and have a word with myself now :p
Enjoy the rest
Thanks for your help both!
I am now only announcing the correct things.
I'll go and have a word with myself now :p
Enjoy the rest of the weekend,
Lee
-Original Message-
From: Shane Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 05/07/2008 20:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Lee Hetherington;
LOL I am peering with two different ASes... Telia and Telstra PSInet :p
Just added the reject, about to fire them back up.
Lee
-Original Message-
From: Shane Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 05/07/2008 20:19
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Lee Hetherington; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Or maybe they wouldn't be upset if you were providing a reliable link
between two previously un-peered AS's.
On Jul 5, 2008, at 12:11 PM, Scott Morris wrote:
HA! You are correct that they SHOULDN'T accept that from you,
but Best
ideas are not always implemented. :) Just make sure y
Add term 2 then reject.
-Original Message-
From: Lee Hetherington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 3:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Shane Ronan
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [j-nsp] Odd BGP Issue
Ah, no it doesnt...
I have this:
policy-statement pe
HA! You are correct that they SHOULDN'T accept that from you, but Best
ideas are not always implemented. :) Just make sure you have a reject at
the end of your export policy to then and it'll be much better then!
Otherwise, enjoy making their route table a bit mental, but if it's the same
You'll need to apply a filter to your outbound BGP sessions to ONLY
send YOUR routes.
By default routes learned by BGP are automatically sent out other BGP
peers.
Here's an example from one of my multi-peered routers.
policy-options {
policy-statement localannounce {
term speci
Ah, no it doesnt...
I have this:
policy-statement peer-announce {
term 1 {
from {
prefix-list our-networks;
}
then accept;
}
}
Then I apply that as the export to each peer.
Lee
-Original Message-
From: Scott Mor
Thanks Scott...
I am peering with interface addresses...
I have specific export statements which export a particular filter list, which
only includes a /23 of addresses. For some reason when showing what I am
advertising to AS1200 i'm announcing the full route table. I am surprised an
ISP wo
Well, does your export policy to the neighbor have a reject statement after
the accepting of your own prefix list?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lee Hetherington
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 3:06 PM
To: Shane Ronan
Cc: juniper-ns
LOL, I am indeed announcing the entire route table to AS1200 from AS1299.
How can I stop this? I am using the same prefix list to each provider, and
should only be announcing a specific range of IP's?
Many Thanks,
Lee
--
Lee Hetherington
Technical Services Lead
REDtechnology.com
T: +44 (0)
I've seen this type of thing before with the random dropping and "hold time
exceeded" message when a routing loop has been introduced.
Are you peering to a loopback on your peer's router, or to the directly
connected physical link? Watch to be sure you aren't learning through BGP
the connected li
Shane,
That makes sense, the CIDR report site shows us as an upstream to Telia when
the two peers are running.
I'll post the output, 1 sec
Thanks,
Lee
-Original Message-
From: Shane Ronan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat 05/07/2008 19:52
To: Lee Hetherington
Cc: juniper-nsp@puck
One other thing...
Have you looked at all the standard things like memory, etc. on the
router when both sessions are up? Perhaps with the large number of
routes you are receiving the router is bogging down?
Just another thought.
Shane
On Jul 5, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Lee Hetherington wrote:
Sounds like with your configuration you are transiting traffic
between your two peer AS's.
Can you run 'show route advertising-protocol ' for each of
your two peer's when you have both up and running?
It may be that the 2meg link is saturated and the keepalive messages
are not making it a
Hi All,
I have a very odd problem with a J Series router and wonder if anyone can help,
as neither our providers nor JTAC can shed any light on this one.
We have a J2320-JH, it has a Link to AS1200 over a 2meg serial x.21 connection
and then a 100meg connection to AS1299 over ethernet. I have
Thanks.
I haven't tried BFD yet, neither in Cisco nor in Juniper. I heard that
it is very complex. Let me check.
On 7/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi FJ
>
>
> BFD is realy something you can use (like Stacy said) assuming that you have
> BFD configured on both sides (lik
For us uninitiated, what is contained in this API?
On Jul 5, 2008, at 9:05 AM, Stacy W. Smith wrote:
On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Mike Porter wrote:
Hi,
What is the lastest release of the JUNOS Perl API?
junoscript-perl-6.4R1.6-domestic.tar.gz?
Thanks,
Mike
I believe there's a correspond
On Jul 4, 2008, at 9:01 AM, Mike Porter wrote:
Hi,
What is the lastest release of the JUNOS Perl API?
junoscript-perl-6.4R1.6-domestic.tar.gz?
Thanks,
Mike
I believe there's a corresponding version of the JUNOS Perl API for
every JUNOS software release. It's just not as easy to find as i
26 matches
Mail list logo
