I need to configure (if possible ) a vpn with rsa authentication.i have some
tokens which generate the tokens codes and have setup the securID server.
I already have a IPSEC vpn. I need to know what steps to take to use rsa
tokens to authenticate when requesting access to the vpn.
Any help
I think Erdem is right in that the ASM is optional in the M7i chassis.
I'm not sure that many customers took the option of the M7i without
the ASM, but the option was definitely there. The absence of the ASM
does not automatically mean that a discreet Tunnel PIC *will* be
installed,
Hi Everybody
I have been the the JNCIS book and preparing for the exam to i came across the
L2 VPNS section. Finding it difficult to identify the real world application of
such L2 vpns using FR and ATM.
Can anyone explain me where these are used and why.
Thanks
regards
abhijeet.c
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 19:21:50 Abhi wrote:
I have been the the JNCIS book and preparing for the exam
to i came across the L2 VPNS section. Finding it
difficult to identify the real world application of such
L2 vpns using FR and ATM.
Can anyone explain me where these are used and why.
Hi Abhi,
We are providing connectivity over MPLS cloud for customers on
Ethernet via L2 VPN, by separate VLAN IDs.
Other type of L2 VPNs are also there deployed in many n/ws.
-FJ
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Abhi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Everybody
I have been the the JNCIS book and
According to the PR... a work around exists, and the PR is closed? What
is the workaround?
Thanks
Anand
Beny D Setyawan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07/15/2008 11:58 PM
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
cc
Subject
Re: [j-nsp] Best
I have to jump in, since I am also interested :-)
My question is, what do you think the cost/benefit of L2VPN over VPLS?
It seems that L2VPN is restricted to point-to-point and there is a
separate vrf (and a routing table) for each link, while VPLS maintains
a single vrf and routing table. Have
And how well do L2 VPN and L2 Ciruit scale up in the SP environment and
which are more preferred ones for deploying these services.
thanks
regards
abhijeet.c
- Original Message
From: Farhan Jaffer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Abhi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Juniper Puck
You'll be fine as long as you are not expecting the Netscreen to tag
the frames. Otherwise, the HA interfaces (or pseudo-HA interfaces
that you've designated as such) look like regular Ethernet interfaces,
so as long as you've got a normal Ethernet handoff with end-to-end L2
connectivity between
Hi Simon,
Your statement that there is a separate routing table for each p2p
link is not quite true. With l2vpn (as opposed to l2circuit - aka
martini) there is a single routing-table for each collection of p2p
links associated with a single group of customer sites which belong to
a single
I have to jump in, since I am also interested :-)
My question is, what do you think the cost/benefit of L2VPN over VPLS?
It seems that L2VPN is restricted to point-to-point and there is a
separate vrf (and a routing table) for each link, while VPLS maintains
a single vrf and routing table.
For dial-up VPN applications, you can configure an Auth or L2TP user
and authenticate them against the SecurID database. I would recommend
configuring an Auth user as the SecurID cannot assign remote settings
to an L2TP user. Once you've configured your Auth user account and
set up
I have an working ipsec vpn with xauth.i use the shrew soft vpn client. can
I just forward the requests to the RSA authentication manager instead of the
local database?
I tried it but with luck.
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Fouant [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16,
Steinar,
Do you have any decent refs or axamples for getting started with L2circuit?
ie we have an existing pure L3 set up, what do we need to do to add L2
fuctionality across multiple sites?
Thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to jump in, since I am also interested :-)
My question is,
Thanks a lot, guys. I definitely learned a lot from all of you :-)
-Simon
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 10:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to jump in, since I am also interested :-)
My question is, what do you think the cost/benefit of L2VPN over VPLS?
It seems that L2VPN is restricted to
Whoops, sorry I forgot to mention that you can use an IKE/XAuth
account as well. Yep, if you've got it already set up, you should
just be able to forward the authentication requests toward the RSA
server as opposed to the local database and you should be good to go.
As I mentioned before
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 22:21:57 Ian MacKinnon wrote:
Steinar,
Do you have any decent refs or axamples for getting
started with L2circuit?
ie we have an existing pure L3 set up, what do we need to
do to add L2 fuctionality across multiple sites?
Apart from study guides and such, I've
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 21:19:47 Abhi wrote:
And how well do L2 VPN and L2 Ciruit scale up in the
SP environment and which are more preferred ones for
deploying these services.
This is likely to start a heated debate, but I guess scaling
of L2VPN's comes down to the signaling +
Hey gang. Hoped to get a sense for how others handle excess traffic
in a given queue in a QoS environment. For example, if you allocate a
customer 50Mbps bronze, 30Mbps silver, 20Mbps gold service (and
policers enforce these limits), do you folks opt to drop any 'gold'
traffic in excess of
We've been using L2VPN exclusively for PtP customers and it works
just fine. Haven't tested the scalability much yet, as we have less
than 100 of them on our busiest box, and it's a T-series with ample
resources. I dabbled in L2Circuits recently, and found that I liked
them as well, especially
Doesn't seem to be the case though, even though logic would dictate
that the switch should just pass the frames
I am starting to suspect that the Nortel do not recognise the frames
and thus are dropping it, as the HA interface MAC only appears on the
access port and not on the trunk port.
21 matches
Mail list logo
