On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 02:36:32PM -0300, Rubens Kuhl Jr. wrote:
> >> On the 7600 and the ASR1000, is that hardware accelerated NAT a
> >> default option, or are those add-on features?
> >
> > On both the 7600 and the ASR it is in the base images and ready to
> > just configure. Crazy for Cisco, I
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Rubens Kuhl Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Brandon Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> On the 7600 and the ASR1000, is that hardware accelerated NAT a
>>> default option, or are those add-on features?
>>
>> On both the 7600 and th
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Brandon Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On the 7600 and the ASR1000, is that hardware accelerated NAT a
>> default option, or are those add-on features?
>
> On both the 7600 and the ASR it is in the base images and ready to
> just configure. Crazy for Cisco, I
> On the 7600 and the ASR1000, is that hardware accelerated NAT a
> default option, or are those add-on features?
On both the 7600 and the ASR it is in the base images and ready to
just configure. Crazy for Cisco, I know. You'd think they'd milk
another license out of you somewhere. :)
-Brandon
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Brandon Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Pardon my ignorance, but do the high-end Cisco platforms do NAT
>> without any specialized hardware?
>
> 7200 - Software based so yes. (Probably more comparible to a J4350 or
> J6350 anyway)
> 7600 - Hardware accelerated
> Pardon my ignorance, but do the high-end Cisco platforms do NAT
> without any specialized hardware?
7200 - Software based so yes. (Probably more comparible to a J4350 or
J6350 anyway)
7600 - Hardware accelerated NAT in the PFE
ASR1000 - Hardware accelerated NAT
GSR 12k - Requires the MSB (Multi-
Once upon a time, Chris Adams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I have an OC-3 (POS running PPP) between two POPs (an M10i at each end)
> getting errors, and this is the first time I've had to debug errors on a
> SONET link.
Thanks for everybody's help. After many late-night hours spent in a
comedy of
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Brian Spade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ouch, no NAT on a router? OK, guess I need to figure something else out.
Pardon my ignorance, but do the high-end Cisco platforms do NAT
without any specialized hardware? You could always move to J-Series.
These are intend
8 matches
Mail list logo