Re: [j-nsp] CoS Marking/Rewrite Theory

2008-10-05 Thread Alex
Chris, If you don't need to use a separate queue for all 20 classes and want just to rewrite DSCP on egde for all 20 classes, you can do it using FC+LP combination as distinct attributes to match upon in rewrite-rule. You will need M320 or T-series to do that

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Hold time expiry

2008-10-05 Thread Daniel Roesen
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:36:25AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: Juniper includes all L2 overhead Not really. For Ethernet, Juniper does NOT include the 4 octets FCS (frame checksum). So Cisco 1500 == Juniper 1514, not 1518 as one might guess. Now enable vlan-tagging on the Juniper

Re: [j-nsp] CoS Marking/Rewrite Theory

2008-10-05 Thread Chris Evans
Yea I don't want to assign them to seperate queues, but I do not want packets that already have a DSCP bit assigned to be rewritten. If I have more differentiated traffic then classes available on the box, I'm out of luck essentially. Also I'm not using the M320 or T series.. I'm really working

Re: [j-nsp] CoS Marking/Rewrite Theory

2008-10-05 Thread Chris Evans
Derick, HMM is right, I'm going to work with the Juniper SE's on this to get this feature added or if there are any other potential workarounds. Chris On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Chris Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: First of all please forgive me if I cause confusion on this and let me

Re: [j-nsp] BGP Hold time expiry

2008-10-05 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 01:48:41PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote: On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 08:36:25AM -0500, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: Juniper includes all L2 overhead Not really. For Ethernet, Juniper does NOT include the 4 octets FCS (frame checksum). So Cisco 1500 == Juniper 1514, not