Re: [j-nsp] aggregate and generated routes

Hello Paul, instead of using from protocol aggregate, stating from protocol ospf would not do what you want? Regards, Daniel Paul Civati wrote the following on 22/10/2008 11:50: Diogo Montagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a common practical usage for aggregate routes is on border routers to

[j-nsp] RSVP error: ignoring Recovery Label 0 unacceptable

Hi all , I have created a RSVP TE tunnel betwen a Juniper M20 an Huawei N40e routers but the lsp is still down , in the cspf logs i don't see any error but in rsvp log I see RSVP error: ignoring Recovery Label 0 unacceptable have someone see this before , what does this error messages

[j-nsp] 'phantom' link aggregation interface

Does anyone know what is this ae1.32767 interface. I only configured ae1. Where is this additional interface came from? Thanks, Marlon Logical interface ae1.1 (Index 68) (SNMP ifIndex 20211) Flags: SNMP-Traps 0x4000 VLAN-Tag [ 0x8100.1 0x8100.2 ] Encapsulation: ENET2 Statistics

[j-nsp] EX-series VLAN info via SNMP

Hi everyone, I've written a lot of software that uses SNMP for querying various things about a switch's config for a lot of different vendors. Everyone does this simple thing in bizarre and confusing ways. But never until the EX series have I seen a switch that appears to have no way to get the

Re: [j-nsp] 'phantom' link aggregation interface

Hey Marlon, IFL 32767 is a control logical interface that is used for things like send/receive of untagged control packets. Ie. STP, etc.. it is automatically created. Cheers, Truman Boyes On 23/10/2008, at 1:09 PM, Marlon Duksa wrote: Does anyone know what is this ae1.32767 interface.

[j-nsp] quickly retireing sw relases

Does anyone know why is JNPR so quickly retiring SW releases? JUNOS 9.0 is released not even a year ago. Why they are already talking about retiring it? Technical Bulletin Subject: End of Support Reminder - JUNOS 9.0 software Thanks, Marlon ___

Re: [j-nsp] 'phantom' link aggregation interface

I believe this is used to used to rx/tx link control traffic on the ae, i.e., LACP. HTHs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marlon Duksa Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:10 AM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] 'phantom'

Re: [j-nsp] quickly retireing sw relases

Does anyone know why is JNPR so quickly retiring SW releases? JUNOS 9.0 is released not even a year ago. Why they are already talking about retiring it? Technical Bulletin Subject: End of Support Reminder - JUNOS 9.0 software Please see Juniper's End-of-Life policy at

Re: [j-nsp] RSVP error: ignoring Recovery Label 0 unacceptable

Hello, If I'm not mistaken, the router receiving a label 0 advertisement will understand it is the penultimate hop and will pop the outmost label when sending packets downstream. It looks it's happening within a backup path, so it should not prevent the LSP from coming online. It sounds

Re: [j-nsp] export policy Junos 9.0

Hi, I once experienced this case too and already open a case with JTAC with no satisfying answer. One thing that a workaround is by creating the export policy not in the peer hierarchy but in the group hierarchy. If you have multiple peer in the group statement and need to have different policy