Hi,
Refer to following instructions to upgrade to 9.2,
In JUNOS Release 8.5, the JUNOS software was extended to use FreeBSD
version 6.1. As a result, the following requirements apply when you upgrade
your routing platform to JUNOS Release 8.5 and later:
For J-series, M-series, MX-series, and
Hi,
We know that there is a big change from 8.4-8.5, that is why we decided to
wait a for a while.
Now we are planning to go with 9.2. We have enough free space to do an
upgrade. The question is how should we do an upgrade or what are your
experiences? Should we go directly to 9.2 ar we should do
We went from 8.5-9.1R1.8, then to 9.2R2.15, both with little or no
problems. I don't know of any specific reasons to not go 8.5-9.2,
but Release Notes and upgrade instructions may provide insight.
Otherwise, 8.5-9.1-9.2 worked for me.
David
2009/1/4 Robert Kern cj1...@gmail.com:
Hi,
We
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:03:05PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
local-address 2001:db8::3:ff7b;
family inet6-vpn {
apply-groups BGP-OUTBOUND-POLICY6-L3VPN6;
unicast;
}
export BGP-OUTBOUND-POLICY6;
peer-as 65000;
neighbor 2001:db8::5:ff79;
neighbor
Just out of Interest - how much RAM do you have in your SSB's? I had the same
problem trying to run NSR on our M20's with not enough RAM.
Cheers,
Callum
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Nugroho WH
Hi,
How much RAM do you have on your SSB's? I don’t think it is the RE RAM that is
causing the problem.
Callum
-Original Message-
From: Joerg Staedele [mailto:j...@tnib.de]
Sent: 05 January 2009 08:39
To: Callum Barr; 'Nugroho WH Adisubrata'; juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
Subject:
Oh sorry.. You meant SSB.. We have 128MB on them (heap utilization is ~35%) ...
So it's enough...
That's what the gdb says on the core-file:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x081bbbff in aspath_path_reinit ()
#1 0x0820cf91 in bgp_recv_v4_message ()
#2 0x0820d11c in bgp_reinit_rt ()
#3 0x0821194e in
Yer... I'd log it with JTAC in that case...
We had a similar issue when we had 64meg RAM on our SSB's. RPD would come up -
sync with the backup RE, BGP would come up, that it would get to a certain
number of routes and crash. Can confirm NSR works sweet on an M20 running
JUNOS 9.1R2.10 tho
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:09:08 +0100
From: Daniel Roesen d...@cluenet.de
Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 09:03:05PM +0800, Mark Tinka wrote:
local-address 2001:db8::3:ff7b;
family inet6-vpn {
apply-groups BGP-OUTBOUND-POLICY6-L3VPN6;
Hi,
We have RE-2.0 with 768MB.. I run a top while testing this issue and the ram
is not fully used (there's ~70MB of free memory) ... I spent now several days
with debugging this issue but didnt come to an end.. The backup RE is syncing
with the primary RE .. And after it finished (the CPU
10 matches
Mail list logo
