On Monday 05 January 2009 03:09:08 am Daniel Roesen wrote:
This would native IPv6 MPLS L3VPN support, which isn't
there (no customer demand, yaddayadda).
Our SE told us, a couple of weeks back, that an IPv6 control
plane fr MPLS should be available at the end of this year.
We'll wait and
From: Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:01:58 +0800
On Monday 05 January 2009 11:54:31 pm Kevin Oberman wrote:
The end of WHICH year?
Ummh, 2009.
Guess I needed a smiley.
We've been running native IPv6 support for several years and have been
asking for
On Monday 05 January 2009 11:54:31 pm Kevin Oberman wrote:
The end of WHICH year?
Ummh, 2009.
Mark.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
On Monday 05 January 2009 03:57:16 am Kevin Oberman wrote:
Unless your iBGP mesh is very small, it's far easier to
run a single mesh. We have always exchanged our IPv6
routes over an IPv4 iBGP mesh just to make things more
manageable. When we see really complete IPv6 support in
JunOS, we
From: Mark Tinka mti...@globaltransit.net
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:06:05 +0800
Sender: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
On Monday 05 January 2009 03:09:08 am Daniel Roesen wrote:
This would native IPv6 MPLS L3VPN support, which isn't
there (no customer demand, yaddayadda).
Our SE
5 matches
Mail list logo
