Hi All,
I need your input regarding BGP loadbalancing with multipath option.
In JNCIP-M study guide, one of the requirement given in iBGP case study is
to Redistribute a summary of the RIP routes into IBGP from both r6 and r7
and in second requiement r5 must IBGP load-balance to the summary
Do you have the load-balance per-packet enabled on your forwarding table ?
Could you give us the output of : show route protocol bgp logical-router R5
extensive
Regards,
David
-Message d'origine-
De : juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
Have you configured a load balance policy for your forwarding-table ?
m...@lab1_mx960 show configuration policy-options policy-statement
Load-Balance-Policy
then {
load-balance per-packet;
}
m...@lab1_mx960 show configuration routing-options forwarding-table
export Load-Balance-Policy;
to
This is what i am pointing to by enabling per packet-load balance we
able to load balance to RIP prefix. But in JNCIP-M study guide Book author
did't implement per-packet load balance in the case study solution. only
multipath is enable to load balnce the RIP prefix. is the statement given in
Hi
Just been reading a bit and had a quick question.
With Junos it states that when you enable LDP protocol it will by
default only make a FEC and subsequent label for the /32 loopback.( from
JNCIS-M Book, quite old)
( Correct me if im wrong )
What happens with an IOS box? Does it
i quess cisco-nsp will be more relevant , but short answer is it will
assign and advertise FEC/Label mapping to every IGP derived ( and
static/interface if local ) prefix.
Since it works with independent control mode, it won't have to wait
for binding from upstream to advertise IGP mappings.
pm
R2 and R3 are the endpoints of an EoMPLS circuit
R1 is physically connected to the EoMPLS endpoint on R2
R1 -- R2 ==EoMPLS== R3
Is it possible for R1 to talk IP with R3, for instance establish a BGP session?
___
juniper-nsp mailing list
Anyone looked at or tested this optic out for the EXs yet? Does it
really support 10/100 copper in a SFP port? We have some sites that we
are deploying an ex4200 24F but will require handing a few customers an
100/Full copper connection. Trying to avoid deploying multiple chassis.
--
-Mike
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 12:42:16PM +0100, William Jackson wrote:
What happens with an IOS box? Does it have the same behavior or does it
create an FEC for every entry in the routing table?
By default yes, you need to lock it down to just the routes you want.
For example:
no mpls ldp
Hi,
R1 and R3 can form a multihop bgp session if you only require bgp between R1
and R3.
Do you need to share the same network at R1 and R3 ? I mean that do you need
to form a backtoback ip connectivity ?
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:22 PM, The Dark One thedark...@list.ru wrote:
R2 and R3 are the
On Tuesday 24 March 2009 07:42:16 pm William Jackson wrote:
What happens with an IOS box? Does it have the same
behavior or does it create an FEC for every entry in the
routing table?
IOS setups FEC's for all Static, Connected and IGP routes.
It will also advertise those by default, which is
What if you want to configure JUNOS to advertise MPLS labels for all Static,
Connected and IGP routes.
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Tinka
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009 8:52 PM
To:
You don't need to configure per packet-load balance during the JNCIP-M lab.
All you have to do is multipath..
Regards,
Masood
-Original Message-
From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net
[mailto:juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Aamir Saleem
Sent: Tuesday, March 24, 2009
13 matches
Mail list logo
