On Friday 03 April 2009 09:52:58 am Cord MacLeod wrote:
> Apparently my Juniper reps are completely different from
> yours, I've been recommended by them not to run 9.4 on my
> ex platform as of yet. and stick with 9.3R2.8, which I've
> not run into a bug with yet. (save a minor annoying
> missin
On Friday 03 April 2009 09:14:28 am Richard A Steenbergen
wrote:
> Dare I ask who you're defending here? In all honesty,
> with respect to the quality and time/attention that goes
> into the software development and QA process of new
> software, JUNOS has gone massively down hill lately.
> Anyone
Apparently my Juniper reps are completely different from yours, I've
been recommended by them not to run 9.4 on my ex platform as of yet.
and stick with 9.3R2.8, which I've not run into a bug with yet. (save
a minor annoying missing feature of "except" in the ACL)
On Apr 2, 2009, at 10:48
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 07:39:16PM -0600, Tommy Perniciaro wrote:
> I got something for everyone.
>
> http://photos-f.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-snc1/v2439/7/22/80403768/n80403768_31273893_6328.jpg
>
> And that's the truth!
You forgot to include a URL to where we can get some of those. :)
--
Ri
I got something for everyone.
http://photos-f.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-snc1/v2439/7/22/80403768/n80403768_31273893_6328.jpg
And that's the truth!
On 4/2/09 4:25 PM, "Robert Raszuk" wrote:
Hi Richard,
> Honestly, I think you should just give up now and accept the fact that
> Juniper is th
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 04:25:14PM -0700, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> > Honestly, I think you should just give up now and accept the fact that
> > Juniper is the new Cisco.
>
> Excuse me ? Cisco in vast majority of new products is way much better
> now. Yes historically there was an issue with IOS, bu
Hi Richard,
> Honestly, I think you should just give up now and accept the fact that
> Juniper is the new Cisco.
Excuse me ? Cisco in vast majority of new products is way much better
now. Yes historically there was an issue with IOS, but AFAIK that has
been also fixed now.
* Look at highly d
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:48:26PM -0400, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
> Dearest Juniper, please pay more attention to validating configs in
> newer JUNOS vs configs that are allowed on older EX-series software.
Honestly, I think you should just give up now and accept the fact that
Juniper is the new Cis
Upon upgrading an EX4200 stack from 9.2R2.15 to 9.4R2.9, I found that
some damned process, chassism or something, was crashing repeatedly and
preventing any interfaces from coming up. I wish I had taken the time
to note which process it was, but the following will reproduce it.
configure any inte
Hi!
At the moment I am trying to get a M7i as LNS working to terminate DSL
lines. At the moment it seems, that the tunnel is trying to build, but
could not be established, due to a dead tunnel 6 pic. I understand,
that I have one of these, but do I have to switch it alive somehow?
the log
10 matches
Mail list logo
