I tried to configure a confederation on the M120 router (means that Nantech
and the M120 router are in the same confederation but not in the same AS)
the error message changed, the new error message is " AS path attribute
problem ".
I tried the same think in a cisco router and it works fine, there
Excellent point:
s...@router> show services accounting flow
error: Sampling does not have flow accounting configured
Again, this worked in 8.5, but not 9.2 -- there have not been any changes apart
from those may to the rate of sampling in forwarding-options->sampling. I've
looked at accountin
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Stephen Fulton wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> Thanks for the tip. I do have NTP set up and running correctly.
>
> -- Stephen
When you run a 'show services accounting flow' or 'show services
accounting status/usage' does it appear that accounting is even
enabled?
--
Stefa
Stefan,
Thanks for the tip. I do have NTP set up and running correctly.
-- Stephen
Stefan Fouant wrote:
Make sure you have a proper NTP source. It's not documented but
somewhere in JUNOS 9.x they started requiring NTP to be setup in order
to make sure your flows had accurate timestamps.
On
Make sure you have a proper NTP source. It's not documented but
somewhere in JUNOS 9.x they started requiring NTP to be setup in order
to make sure your flows had accurate timestamps.
On 4/18/09, Stephen Fulton wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I recently upgraded a J-series 6350 from 8.4 to 9.2, and it a
Thanks guys for your answers.
BR
Robert
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 5:48 PM, Erdem Sener wrote:
> Hi,
>
> AFAIK lt- interfaces are treated like any other interface from a
> firewall/policer and CoS perspective; e.g:
>
> unit 0 {
>encapsulation ethernet;
> peer-unit 1;
>family inet {
>
Hi Amos,
You can use an AVP called Framed-IP-Address to assign IPs to
your PPP customers during the authentication process and advertise
"access-internal" routes with some routing protocols.
[ ]'s
Thiago Lizardo de Moraes
-Mensagem original-
De: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.ne
Hi,
AFAIK lt- interfaces are treated like any other interface from a
firewall/policer and CoS perspective; e.g:
unit 0 {
encapsulation ethernet;
peer-unit 1;
family inet {
policer {
input policer_500meg;
output policer_500meg;
}
address
There are different Tunnel PICs depending upon the type of FPC in
which they are being installed. Each of these offer differing amounts
of tunnel bandwidth. The PB-TUNNEL is for Type 3 FPCs and is
inherently limited to 10Gbps of tunneling bandwidth. See page 3 of http://www.juniper.net/us/en/
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 03:21:24PM +0100, Mohamed Jrad wrote:
> There is no option for configuring Nantech TrafficGen to negotiate
> inet-multicast.
> The only think Ican do in Nantech is to put the source address, the
> destination address, the local AS and the peer-AS.
So Nantech TrafficGen is
Hi
There is no option for configuring Nantech TrafficGen to negotiate
inet-multicast.
The only think Ican do in Nantech is to put the source address, the
destination address, the local AS and the peer-AS.
Thanks
2009/4/17 Chuck Anderson
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:11:42PM +0100, Mohamed Jrad
Hi Stacy,
thanks for answer. Is there a way to limit the traffic between
logical-routers to 10Ge for example and what is the bandwidth limitation for
a tunnel between LRs.
Regards,
Robert
On Sat, Apr 18, 2009 at 7:29 AM, Stacy W. Smith wrote:
>
> On Apr 17, 2009, at 10:57 PM, Robert Kern wrot
12 matches
Mail list logo
