Hi
Just dipping my feet into the world of MPLS and have some quick
questions.
On my ingress router I am setting up some RSVP label paths with strict
ERO's, I add the fast reroute option and the adaptive option. So that
the primary and secondary paths are already up.
On my transit
From my own tests with this, Junipers will swap the path in the same
second. But yes, generally a single ping will be lost.
On Apr 27, 2009, at 8:00 AM, William Jackson wrote:
Hi
Just dipping my feet into the world of MPLS and have some quick
questions.
On my ingress router I am
hi all
I just want to know if there is a method to load-share between two
static route in ScreenOS;
I mean that I want to define two next-hope for the same destination.
thanks
___
juniper-nsp mailing list juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net
See in line tobelow
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:00 PM, William Jackson wjack...@sapphire.gi wrote:
On my ingress router I am setting up some RSVP label paths with strict
ERO's, I add the fast reroute option and the adaptive option. So that
the primary and secondary paths are already up.
Hi,
try this:
policy-options policy-statement lb
then {
load-balance per-packet;
}
then you export the policy
set routing-options forwarding-table export lb
and this is how load-balance is enabled.
This will add both routes in the forwarding table and real fast reroute will
be activated.
Jason,
JUNOS supports global class 2 (IP address) and class 1 (local) endpoint
discriminator options. Class 3 (MAC ID) is not supported by JUNOS.
Endpoint discriminator is not required in order to negotiate MLPPP. The
Juniper is sending a Conf-Reject for that option, as expected.
Regards,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Ibariouen Khalid
ibariouen.kha...@ericsson.com wrote:
hi all
I just want to know if there is a method to load-share between two
static route in ScreenOS;
Hi,
ScreenOS supports ECMP (set vr trust max-ecmp-routes X). You can load share
on up to 4 routes.
7 matches
Mail list logo