Re: [j-nsp] VRRP in Olive?

2009-08-07 Thread Patrik Olsson
Wait here. You got JUNOS 9.X to work with Olive? Is it only in QEMU or have someone actually gotten it to work in VMWare aswell? Cheers Patrik All. This patched works with the lastest qemu stream, http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive; confirmed working on junos 9.3 :- Since

Re: [j-nsp] VRRP in Olive?

2009-08-07 Thread Bjørn Mork
Patrick Lynchehaun patr...@lynchehaun.net writes: Bjørn Tks for this link. Got a reply from Sten Weil with an updated link: http://repo.or.cz/w/qemu/ar7.git?a=blob;f=hw/eepro100.c The quick/dirty fix below works for mcast traffic with current qemu cvs. Yes, but it probably doesn't

Re: [j-nsp] lsp required for vpls?

2009-08-07 Thread snort bsd
I think you got confused with concepts of signaling protocol and lsp istelf. mpls is foundation of all new technologies that rely on mpls label switching. but mpls lsp depends on signaling protocols such as rsvp or ldp for the label swapping. bgp is still the protocol that utilize the lsp (in

Re: [j-nsp] Command to modify ADSPEC object default on PATH messages.

2009-08-07 Thread Nalkhande Tarique Abbas
AFAIK, JUNOS uses the Adspec field for maximum transmission unit (MTU) negotiation. So when an LSP is created across a set of links with different MTU sizes, the ingress router does not know what the smallest MTU is on the LSP path. By default, the maximum packet size for the LSP is based on the

Re: [j-nsp] Command to modify ADSPEC object default on PATH messages.

2009-08-07 Thread Thiago Drechsel
Hi Nalkhande. Thanks for your help. MTU information goes inside the PATH message, on object ADSPEC - Default General Parameters data fragment. What I need is the command to include in the PATH Message the following object: ADSPEC - Guaranteed Service data fragment (described on RFC2210, item

Re: [j-nsp] Command to modify ADSPEC object default on PATH messages.

2009-08-07 Thread Harry Reynolds
We state we support the rfc, which I believe means we can process a Path message with such an Adspec, but AFAIK, there is no way to configure the ingress node to populate a GS based Adspec. JUNOS does mpls QoS via DiffServ TE, not IntServ. HTHs -Original Message- From:

[j-nsp] JNCIE-FWV

2009-08-07 Thread Fahad Khan
Dear Folks, Has this certification been launched??? can any one provide the outline/Info for this please. Thanks in advance, regards, -- Muhammad Fahad Khan IT Specialist Global Technology Services, IBM fa...@pk.ibm.com +92-321-2370510 +92-301-8247638

Re: [j-nsp] JNCIE-FWV

2009-08-07 Thread Tim Eberhard
As far as I know, no.. It was created and even beta tested. There are a couple of juniper (and former juniper) employees walking around with the title but last I heard it is not available to the public. Without any inside knowledge I would attribute this to the SRX platform and the Junos