On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Yue Min wrote:
> Actually I feel the way ( all community in all routers rather than
> specific community in specific router ) would save your time not waste
> your time.
>
I guess it depends on what you are doing. Doing a copy and paste of a bunch
of community
Actually I feel the way ( all community in all routers rather than
specific community in specific router ) would save your time not waste
your time.
On 9/10/09, Stefan Fouant wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Stevanus wrote:
>
>> Sorry for a little bit OOT. So suppose I configure bgp co
Hi - can someone point me to some more info, somewhere I can find more on
radius accounting for subscriber access.
I did enabled it on MX but I can't find any info one where sta stats are
stored and which statistics are accounted for? For example, I'd like to
collect number of packets for the subsc
We run OSPF & BGP with no MPLS. Our standard protect RE filter does:
-Allow OSPF, BGP, VRRP, BFD
-Drop all first fragments & trailing fragments
-Allow ICMP, TACACS, SSH, Telnet, SNMP, DNS, FTP
-Drop everything else
Appropriate entries permit only certain source/destinations. This has been
worki
> My point of view in this case is the following:
> - the network should have standard MTU configured on both side of all
> links; should there be a non standard, this is a misconfiguration.
Agree about the "should" - however, the real world isn't always that
nice. In our case we have standardized
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:28 AM, Stevanus wrote:
> Sorry for a little bit OOT. So suppose I configure bgp community
> attributes for all routers instead of all EBGP peering routers as required
> in the exam, then I won't lose any points?
> Thanks
>
> - Stevanus -
>
Again, you could do this, unl
My point of view in this case is the following:
- the network should have standard MTU configured on both side of all
links; should there be a non standard, this is a misconfiguration.
- in the loopback firewall filter, fragments are dropped with the count
and log option so that we can see what is
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:40 PM, Alexandre Snarskii wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:06:16PM +0200, Bit Gossip wrote:
>> Experts,
>> on the ground that only the following protocols are allowed to reach the
>> RE:
>> - BGP (runs PMTU so should not fragment packets)
>> - ISIS is only L2 so it is
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 01:06:16PM +0200, Bit Gossip wrote:
> Experts,
> on the ground that only the following protocols are allowed to reach the
> RE:
> - BGP (runs PMTU so should not fragment packets)
> - ISIS is only L2 so it is not blocked by a firewall filter
> - OSPF, LDP, RSVP, PIM, IGMP, BF
> on the ground that only the following protocols are allowed to reach the
> RE:
> - BGP (runs PMTU so should not fragment packets)
> - ISIS is only L2 so it is not blocked by a firewall filter
> - OSPF, LDP, RSVP, PIM, IGMP, BFD, VRRP: don't know about them
> - ssh, snmp, tacacs, ntp, Icmp, domain
Experts,
on the ground that only the following protocols are allowed to reach the
RE:
- BGP (runs PMTU so should not fragment packets)
- ISIS is only L2 so it is not blocked by a firewall filter
- OSPF, LDP, RSVP, PIM, IGMP, BFD, VRRP: don't know about them
- ssh, snmp, tacacs, ntp, Icmp, domain
I
Sorry for a little bit OOT. So suppose I configure bgp community
attributes for all routers instead of all EBGP peering routers as
required in the exam, then I won't lose any points?
Thanks
- Stevanus -
Stefan Fouant wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Hoogen wrote:
But since this wa
12 matches
Mail list logo
