On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 01:32:43AM -0400, Phil Shafer wrote:
> Alexander Shikoff writes:
> >I'm wondering is it possible to generate events based on day of week, i.e.
> >every Friday or Sunday etc.?
> >"set event-options generate-event" allows configuration of time of day only.
> >Any ideas? Thanks
Hello,
I have two Juniper MPLS routers (M10i and SRX210) interconnected via a
bunch of Ethernet switches.
In the M10i I will have a 801.p classifier on the ingress interface of
my VPLS and would like to
have a rewrite-rule so all VPLS packets exiting into the SRX210 are
marked with the proper EXP
Alexander Shikoff writes:
>I'm wondering is it possible to generate events based on day of week, i.e.
>every Friday or Sunday etc.?
>"set event-options generate-event" allows configuration of time of day only.
>Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
No, we don't have day-of-week support. You can have you
Hello All,
I'm wondering is it possible to generate events based on day of week, i.e.
every Friday or Sunday etc.?
"set event-options generate-event" allows configuration of time of day only.
Any ideas? Thanks in advance!
--
MINO-RIPE
___
juniper-nsp m
Actually the existing equipment using RAD modem that do to convert from e1
based to ethernet based. can the J series do like that?
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 9:37 PM, 陈江 wrote:
> hi!
>
> VPLS, L2VPN or L2circuit could done this.
>
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 10:20 PM, amin amin wrote:
>
>> how can c
Is the AE coming up? Try show lacp interfaces and show int ae0 extensive the
show LACP should tell you if you have a timer mismatch between them. If the AE0
isn't up then try a configuration like
Aggregated interface: ae0
LACP state: Role Exp Def Dist Col Syn Aggr Timeout
I believe I have it working. Thank you to all who posted on list and off.
Adding speed 100m to each physical link seem to do the trick (as I am handing
off to a bundled FE pair).
chassis {
aggregated-devices {
ethernet {
device-count 2;
}
}
}
ge-0/0/22 {
Not sure if it matters, but are you using 2 bundles?
Otherwise you could try setting the device-count to 1.
-Arni
On Oct 28, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Bill Blackford wrote:
I am attempting to form a L3 bundle on a EX3200 and am running into
snags. I've been able to form L2 LACP bundles but first tim
Hi Bill
Not sure if it makes a difference, but try telling the switch that it's
a 1G link , i.e.
aggregated-ether-options {
link-speed 10g;
lacp {
active;
}
}
Failing that, maybe if you look in the logs, or at the show interface
ae0 extensive and show lacp interfaces out
Does anybody know if the MX platforms support the Private-VLAN stuff still
in draft status within the IETF?
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sanjib-private-vlan-10
I noticed support on EX switches but couldn't find any mention of MX
platform support.
--
Stefan Fouant
___
I am attempting to form a L3 bundle on a EX3200 and am running into snags. I've
been able to form L2 LACP bundles but first time attempting at L3.
I'm not able to link with another switch, host or device that also is
configured with a LACP L3 bundle.
Details:
EX3200
Ver 9.5R2.7
chassis {
how can configure ethernet over E1 on Jseries without using IP between
Jseries1 and Jseries2? it means interface E1 on Jseries to be bridging mode
LAN-Jseries1---PDH---Jseries2LAN
Regards,
~Samin
___
juniper-nsp mailing
12 matches
Mail list logo