Re: [j-nsp] vulnerability fix not available for 8.5 ?

2010-01-08 Thread Eric Van Tol
-Original Message- From: juniper-nsp-boun...@puck.nether.net [mailto:juniper-nsp- boun...@puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Hunt Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 2:55 PM To: juniper-nsp@puck.nether.net Subject: [j-nsp] vulnerability fix not available for 8.5 ? I just logged in

Re: [j-nsp] vulnerability fix not available for 8.5 ?

2010-01-08 Thread Daniel Verlouw
On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 07:36 -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote: Wait, what? Can anyone confirm the removal of GE-SX-B drivers? 9.5R3.7 seems to work fine with a non-EFPC and PE-1GE-SX-B: FEB REV 10 710-002503 removedFEB-M5-S FPC 0 PIC 0 REV 02

Re: [j-nsp] vulnerability fix not available for 8.5 ?

2010-01-08 Thread Pekka Savola
On Fri, 8 Jan 2010, Daniel Verlouw wrote: On Fri, 2010-01-08 at 07:36 -0500, Eric Van Tol wrote: Wait, what? Can anyone confirm the removal of GE-SX-B drivers? 9.5R3.7 seems to work fine with a non-EFPC and PE-1GE-SX-B: FEB REV 10 710-002503 removedFEB-M5-S FPC 0

Re: [j-nsp] vulnerability fix not available for 8.5 ?

2010-01-08 Thread sthaug
9.5R3.7 seems to work fine with a non-EFPC and PE-1GE-SX-B: FEB REV 10 710-002503 removedFEB-M5-S FPC 0 PIC 0 REV 02 750-003163 removedPE-1GE-SX-B PIC 1 REV 05 750-003163 removedPE-1GE-SX-B

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS

2010-01-08 Thread Andy Davidson
On 8 Jan 2010, at 09:13, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: for example if you hit ctrl-c in the cli anywhere other than at the prompt it locks up the cli process :P Fantastic. :-) I've been trying to replicate this on 9.6R2.11 and can't do this at the edit prompt or the ---(more)--- pause -

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS vulnerability with malformed TCP packets

2010-01-08 Thread Barry Greene
The information is in the security advisory. Are the PSNs the security advisory you are referring to? I didn't see a security advisory as such, and I'm wondering if I'm missing anything. Yes. Juniper has been using the Tech Bulletins (PSNs, etc.) for our Security Advisories.

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS vulnerability with malformed TCP packets

2010-01-08 Thread Florian Weimer
* Barry Greene: The information is in the security advisory. Are the PSNs the security advisory you are referring to? I didn't see a security advisory as such, and I'm wondering if I'm missing anything. -- Florian Weimerfwei...@bfk.de BFK edv-consulting GmbH

Re: [j-nsp] JUNOS

2010-01-08 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 02:56:32PM +, Andy Davidson wrote: On 8 Jan 2010, at 09:13, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: for example if you hit ctrl-c in the cli anywhere other than at the prompt it locks up the cli process :P Fantastic. :-) I've been trying to replicate this on

Re: [j-nsp] vulnerability fix not available for 8.5 ?

2010-01-08 Thread Richard A Steenbergen
On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 02:33:50PM +0100, sth...@nethelp.no wrote: 9.5R3.7 seems to work fine with a non-EFPC and PE-1GE-SX-B: FEB REV 10 710-002503 removedFEB-M5-S FPC 0 PIC 0 REV 02 750-003163 removedPE-1GE-SX-B

Re: [j-nsp] vulnerability fix not available for 8.5 ?

2010-01-08 Thread Kevin Day
On Jan 8, 2010, at 2:35 PM, Richard A Steenbergen wrote: I definitely recall seeing a note about support for FPC non-E's being removed in one of the release notes, but I THINK (don't quote me here, I'm going by vague memory) it was specifically talking about M20. The only gear I still have with